2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2018.8580794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniquely Decodable Ternary Codes for Synchronous CDMA Systems

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the problem of recursively designing uniquely decodable ternary code sets for highly overloaded synchronous code-division multipleaccess (CDMA) systems. The proposed code set achieves larger number of users K < K t max than any other known state-of-the-art ternary codes that offer low-complexity decoders in the noisy transmission. Moreover, we propose a simple decoder that uses only a few comparisons and can allow the user to uniquely recover the information bits. Compared to maximum… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By definition the UD codes are those in which the data of different users can be unambiguously decoded in a noiseless channel using linear recursive decoders [31]. Low-complexity linear decoders were introduced for these UD code sets using either binary {0, 1}, or antipodal {±1}, or alternatively ternary {0, ±1} chips in [27]- [30], [32]- [35]. On the other hand, Lu et al [36] proposed M -ary code sets for the multiple-access adder channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By definition the UD codes are those in which the data of different users can be unambiguously decoded in a noiseless channel using linear recursive decoders [31]. Low-complexity linear decoders were introduced for these UD code sets using either binary {0, 1}, or antipodal {±1}, or alternatively ternary {0, ±1} chips in [27]- [30], [32]- [35]. On the other hand, Lu et al [36] proposed M -ary code sets for the multiple-access adder channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in [30] the authors propose overloaded code sets over the ternary alphabet that has a twin tree structured cross-correlation hierarchy that can be decoded with a simple multi-stage detector. Yet another construction of ternary codes that increases the number of columns, K , of UD codes for a such length compared to those proposed in [29] and [30] with a low-complexity polynomial time decoder is proposed in [32]. The primary reason for such low-complexity decoders is that the code sets are constructed with a certain criteria, which entails lowering the maximum number of users K < K max , as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-known pseudo random sequences are composed of binary bits {0, 1}, e.g., m-sequence, golden sequences [14], Reed-Muller codes [15], Walsh sequences, and etc. With the development of spreading sequences, many papers discuss uniquelydecodable (UD) ternary code sets {−1, 0, +1} for the overloaded synchronous code division multiple-access (CDMA) systems [16]- [21], which can support lager number of users than the classical orthogonal spreading codes. To design lowcomplexity detectors is one of the important topics of the overloaded synchronous CDMA systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these challenges, numerous non-UD [2]- [14], and UD [15]- [36] construction based code sets have been proposed. Examples of such non-UD code sets are pseudonoise spreading (PN) [2], [3], OCDMA/OCDMA (O/O), [4]- [5], PN/OCDMA (PN/O) [6], multiple-OCDMA (MO) [7], improved O/O CDMA [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in [35] the authors propose overloaded code sets over the ternary alphabet that has twin tree structured cross-correlation hierarchy with a simple multi-stage detection. Yet another construction of ternary codes that has K greater than those proposed in [34] and [35] with a very fast decoder is proposed in [36]. The primary reason for such low complexity decoders is that the code sets are constructed with a certain criteria, which entails lowering the maximum number of vectors K < K max , as shown in Table III.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%