The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1986
DOI: 10.1017/s144678870002646x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unique solvability of the strong Hamburger moment problem

Abstract: Methods from the theory of orthogonal polynomials are extended to L-polynomials Y. q n = p a n z". By this means the authors and W. B. Jones (J. Math. Anal. Appl. 98 (1984), 528-554) solved the strong Hamburger moment problem, that is, given a double sequence {c n }°? x , to find a distribution function i|/(r), non-decreasing, with an infinite number of points of increase and bounded on -oo < t < oo, such that for all integers n, c n = f™ x (-t) n dip(t). In this article further methods such as analogues of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Set, as in Proposition 3.31 of [57], 11 (N e (z)) 12 ( e m ∞ (z)) 12 (N e (z)) 21 ( e m ∞ (z)) 21 (N e (z)) 22 = {z ′ ∈ C; (γ e (z)±(γ e (z)) −1 )| z=z ′ = 0}, one notes that the (simple) poles of ( e m ∞ (z)) 11 and ( e m ∞ (z)) 22 (resp., ( e m ∞ (z)) 12 and (…”
Section: Following Lemma 321 Of [57] Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Set, as in Proposition 3.31 of [57], 11 (N e (z)) 12 ( e m ∞ (z)) 12 (N e (z)) 21 ( e m ∞ (z)) 21 (N e (z)) 22 = {z ′ ∈ C; (γ e (z)±(γ e (z)) −1 )| z=z ′ = 0}, one notes that the (simple) poles of ( e m ∞ (z)) 11 and ( e m ∞ (z)) 22 (resp., ( e m ∞ (z)) 12 and (…”
Section: Following Lemma 321 Of [57] Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the moment theory for the SMP and the HMP, wherein the theory of orthogonal polynomials, and the analytic theory of continued fractions, enjoyed a prominent rôle, the extension of the moment theory to the SSMP and the SHMP introduced a 'rational generalisation' of the orthogonal polynomials, namely, the orthogonal Laurent (or L-) polynomials (as well as the introduction of special kinds of continued fractions commonly referred to as positive-T fractions), which are discussed below [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. (The SHMP can also be solved using the spectral theory of unbounded self-adjoint operators in Hilbert space [22]; see, also, [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This problem is equivalent to the strong Hamburger moment problem. For definition and general treatment of this problem, see, e.g., [10,11,25]. The connection between the strong moment problem and the asymptotic expansions problem was treated in [10] for the case that the moment problem is nonsingular, and in [20][21][22][23] for the general case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sri Ranga [2] For any strong distribution, di//(t), the relations (i) Q n {z) is a monic polynomial of degree n, for n > 0, In the three examples of strong symmetric distributions given in [4], namely, the strong Tchebycheff, the strong Legendre and the strong Hermite distributions, we note that the coefficients a n and P n of the associated recurrence relations satisfy, in addition to the expected condition fi n = 0, n > 1, the condition that a 2n are constant for all n > 1. We show here that this is due to these distributions being members of a "special" class of strong symmetric distributions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%