1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01929897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unique sex chromosome mediated behavioral response specificity of hybrid male European corn borer moths

Abstract: Abstract. Unlike the narrow response windows exhibited by the parent races, hybrid male European corn borers resulting from crosses of the E and Z races respond to a wide range of sex pheromone blends. The F~ response profile consists of some individuals that respond to both the Z pheromone and the 65:35 E/Z blend produced by Fa females. Some F~ males fail to respond to any blend and some do not respond as broadly as others. The hybrid male populations, however, are not tuned optimally to the pheromone blend p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Glover et al (1991) reported that many hybrid males from reciprocal crosses failed to complete the behavioral sequence to locate a female, regardless of the blend they were exposed to. In addition, the few males that responded did not exhibit a preference for any particular blend but, rather, were attracted to a broad range of blends (Glover et al, 1991).…”
Section: Reproductive Isolation Between the Strainsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Glover et al (1991) reported that many hybrid males from reciprocal crosses failed to complete the behavioral sequence to locate a female, regardless of the blend they were exposed to. In addition, the few males that responded did not exhibit a preference for any particular blend but, rather, were attracted to a broad range of blends (Glover et al, 1991).…”
Section: Reproductive Isolation Between the Strainsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Glover et al (1991) reported that many hybrid males from reciprocal crosses failed to complete the behavioral sequence to locate a female, regardless of the blend they were exposed to. In addition, the few males that responded did not exhibit a preference for any particular blend but, rather, were attracted to a broad range of blends (Glover et al, 1991). Given that most hybrid males do not respond to any blend, and that the remaining ones are not tuned to any particular blend, F1 hybridization should be seen as a transient stage with a limited possibility of creating recurrent gene flow between the strains.…”
Section: Reproductive Isolation Between the Strainsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…data), and the Mediterranean region of Europe (Anglade and Stockel 1984). Limited gene flow between O. nubilalis pheromone races has been suggested from molecular analyses (Harrison and Vawter 1977;Card e et al 1978;Cianchi et al 1980;Glover et al 1991;Dopman et al 2005), laboratory choice tests (Liebherr and Roelofs 1975), and field collections of F 1 hybrid females that produce a 65:35 E11-to Z11-14:OAc ratio (Klun and Maini 1979;Roelofs et al 1985;Durant et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both strains have an interspecific behavioral antagonist, ( Z )-9-tetradecenyl acetate (Z9-14:OAc) [3]. Female hybrids (ZxE and ExZ) produce an intermediate pheromone blend (35:65 Z:E) and hybrid males respond preferentially to such blends [4,5]. Where the two strains occur in sympatry, hybrids are found in low frequency, between 5-15% [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%