1994
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90510-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniplanar oriented isotactic polypropylene: 3. Properties and morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown that the spherulite is pancaked as deformation proceeds. 16 At a high CR, The modulus and strength of forged samples the layer structure is seen to be composed of a were measured by a conventional tensile tester at stacking of deformed spherulite planes. Takaroom temperature.…”
Section: 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown that the spherulite is pancaked as deformation proceeds. 16 At a high CR, The modulus and strength of forged samples the layer structure is seen to be composed of a were measured by a conventional tensile tester at stacking of deformed spherulite planes. Takaroom temperature.…”
Section: 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Texture evolution of α‐iPP and related deformation mechanisms were studied in tension as well as in uniaxial15, 16 and plane‐strain compression17, 18 modes. Deformation mechanisms of crystallographic origin were found to be responsible for an alignment of the c axis along the direction of plastic flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the overall crystallinity of the deformed samples is lowered only slightly in comparison with the undeformed iPP, the observed substantial damping of the β process with increasing strain should be interpreted in terms of a considerable change in the molecular packing of the amorphous phase resulting in reduced mobility. It was demonstrated for uniaxially compressed iPP30–32 that the density of the amorphous phase increased markedly with increasing strain, which indicated that the average intermolecular distance was smaller than the respective distance in the unoriented amorphous component.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%