2008
DOI: 10.7169/facm/1229696561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unions of sets of lengths

Abstract: Let H be a Krull monoid such that every class contains a prime (this includes the multiplicative monoids of rings of integers of algebraic number fields). For k ∈ N let V k (H) denote the set of all m ∈ N with the following property : There exist atoms (irreducible elements)We show that the sets V k (H) are intervals for all k ∈ N. This solves Problem 37 in [4].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(e) ⇒ (a): Let n ∈ N + such that nρ ∈ N + and n = λ nρ . Then λ nρ < ∞ and, similarly to the previous analysis, there exists L ∈ L with {λ nρ , nρ} ⊆ L. So nρ ≤ sup L and inf L ≤ λ nρ = n, which, again by Lemma 2.10(iv), yields ρ = ρ(L).The next two propositions are the key (technical) results of this paper: In particular, the first of them is a substantial improvement of[7, Lemma 3.4] (see also Claim 3 in the proof of [4, Theorem 2.2(2)]).…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(e) ⇒ (a): Let n ∈ N + such that nρ ∈ N + and n = λ nρ . Then λ nρ < ∞ and, similarly to the previous analysis, there exists L ∈ L with {λ nρ , nρ} ⊆ L. So nρ ≤ sup L and inf L ≤ λ nρ = n, which, again by Lemma 2.10(iv), yields ρ = ρ(L).The next two propositions are the key (technical) results of this paper: In particular, the first of them is a substantial improvement of[7, Lemma 3.4] (see also Claim 3 in the proof of [4, Theorem 2.2(2)]).…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Along the same lines of thought, the present paper is aimed to establish a kind of periodicity of directed families that applies primarily to unions of sets of lengths: Nothing similar had been known so far, modulo the fact that, for important but rather special categories of monoids and domains, the sets U k are arithmetic progressions, if not even intervals as in the case of the ring of integers of a number field or, more in general, of a commutative Krull monoid with finite class group such that each class contains a prime, see [7,Theorem 4.1]. Moreover, some of the achievements of this work will probably help with one of the long term goals in all studies on unions of sets of lengths: To prove a realization theorem in the same spirit of what has already been done with sets of lengths [19] and sets of distances [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless U = g(−g), this contradicts the fact that U ∈ A(G 0 ). Theorem 4.3 implies that ρ 2k (G P ) = kD(G P ) = 5k and that 5k + 1 ≤ ρ 2k+1 (G P ) ≤ 5k + 2 for all k ∈ N. In order to prove that U k (H) is an interval for each k ∈ N, it suffices to show that U k (G P ) ∩ N ≥k is an interval for each k ∈ N. Indeed, this follows from a simple symmetry argument (see [20,Lemma 3.5]). We proceed conclude the proof by proving the following three claims A1, A2, and A3 which clearly imply the assertion.…”
Section: Monoids Of Modules Over Commutative Noetherian Local Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose S is a Krull monoid such that every class contains a prime divisor. Then it was shown only recently that, for all k ∈ N, the unions V k (S) are arithmetical progressions with difference 1 (see [17,Theorem 4.1], [21] for a simpler proof, and also [19]). In [34], unions of sets of lengths are studied for non-principal order in number fields, and in [9], for domains of the form V + XB[X], where V is a discrete valuation domain and B the ring of integers in a finite extension field over the quotient field of V .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%