2013
DOI: 10.2190/wr.17.2.f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Union Yes": The Moderating Effects of Union Instrumentality on Psychological Contract Violations

Abstract: Few empirical studies of psychological contracts have examined the role of unions and unfulfilled psychological contracts. This study has developed and tested a model proposing that union instrumentality moderates the relationship between psychological contract breach (PCB) and psychological contract violations (PCVs), and has investigated the mediating effects of such violations on the relationships between PCB and union commitment and trust in management (n = 215). Moderated regression analyses revealed that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organizational investments in HPWS are related to reducing perceptions of psychological contract violations. Employees see these investments as an indicator of good intentions on the part of their organization, reduce disappointments in their expectations (Braekkan, 2012), feel psychologically safe (Agarwal & Farndale, 2017) and, consequently, exhibit voice behavior (Walumbwa & Schaubroeck, 2009). It suggests that employees' psychological safety can be a possible mediator of the relationship between HPWS and voice behavior because previous research informs that HPWS predict psychological safety (Agarwal & Farndale, 2017) and psychological safety promotes voice behavior (Cheng et al, 2014).…”
Section: Palabras Clavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational investments in HPWS are related to reducing perceptions of psychological contract violations. Employees see these investments as an indicator of good intentions on the part of their organization, reduce disappointments in their expectations (Braekkan, 2012), feel psychologically safe (Agarwal & Farndale, 2017) and, consequently, exhibit voice behavior (Walumbwa & Schaubroeck, 2009). It suggests that employees' psychological safety can be a possible mediator of the relationship between HPWS and voice behavior because previous research informs that HPWS predict psychological safety (Agarwal & Farndale, 2017) and psychological safety promotes voice behavior (Cheng et al, 2014).…”
Section: Palabras Clavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mutual understanding regarding expectations and obligations are derived from past experiences, the party's policies, the candidate's promises and the party's or candidate's legacy. Although the psychological contract has not been applied to voter relationships, it has been utilised to study the relationship between members and labour unions (Braekkan, 2013; Turnley et al, 2004). This study uses the concept of psychological contract to investigate the second research question:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Literature review 2.1 Underpinning theory SET is considered to be the most relevant theory to visualize the impact of HPWS on individual-level behavioral constructs (Kaushik and Mukherjee, 2021), such as employee creativity (Tang et al, 2017), psychological contract violations (Braekkan, 2012), job satisfaction (Zhang et al, 2020) and information exchange (He et al, 2018). It has been noted that a series of social exchange processes intervene in the relationship between human resource practices and their influence on employees' behavioral outcomes (Kehoe and Wright, 2013;Takeuchi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%