2011
DOI: 10.3103/s0095452711050124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unintended effects of genetic modifications and methods of their analysis in plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What's more, cross‐contamination is inevitable unless specific precautions are taken. Similar results were presented previously by Stram and others (2000), and they showed that GMO can be traced in turkey cutlet even though GMO products were not deliberately used in manufacturing. Therefore, the possibility of soy‐contaminated grain used in food producing process could not be easily ruled out.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…What's more, cross‐contamination is inevitable unless specific precautions are taken. Similar results were presented previously by Stram and others (2000), and they showed that GMO can be traced in turkey cutlet even though GMO products were not deliberately used in manufacturing. Therefore, the possibility of soy‐contaminated grain used in food producing process could not be easily ruled out.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Field studies are crucial to quantify phenotypic differences resulting from traditional plant breeding efforts. This is also true for genetically modified plants where there are many sources of genetic variation that may result in phenotypic differences between events, such as unstable gene expression related to placement and number of insertions in the genome, genetic rearrangement near the region where the transgene was inserted, silencing of the transgene by the host, and other unintended effects (Haslberger, 2003; Sorochinskii et al., 2011). In addition, the tissue culturing process frequently results in somaclonal variation, due to an increase in mutation rate and changes in ploidy (Larkin & Scowcroft, 1981; Swedlund & Vasil, 1985), and can account for many of the unintended effects seen in genetically modified plants (Filipecki & Malepszy, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unintended effects can be resulted from the random insertion of exogenous DNA fragments into the plant genome because the insertion event may alter the expression of certain plant intrinsic genes by disruption, silencing, activation, or modification. Although these unintended effects may be deleterious, beneficial, or neutral with respect to plant health or food safety, the public has shown considerable concern regarding potential hazardous effects of GM plants to agro system and human consumer 2 , 3 . The large-scale commercial release of GM crops has sparked intense debates worldwide 3 , 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these unintended effects may be deleterious, beneficial, or neutral with respect to plant health or food safety, the public has shown considerable concern regarding potential hazardous effects of GM plants to agro system and human consumer 2 , 3 . The large-scale commercial release of GM crops has sparked intense debates worldwide 3 , 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%