2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(02)70181-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
129
1
18

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
4
129
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the studies concerning the effect of analgesia in lactogenesis-lactation markers are conflicting [44][45][46][47][48]. In the current study, receiving epidural analgesia had positive correlation with positive feelings, lower posttraumatic stress levels and earlier first feeding after delivery.…”
Section: Laborduration(hours)contrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the studies concerning the effect of analgesia in lactogenesis-lactation markers are conflicting [44][45][46][47][48]. In the current study, receiving epidural analgesia had positive correlation with positive feelings, lower posttraumatic stress levels and earlier first feeding after delivery.…”
Section: Laborduration(hours)contrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In the current study, receiving epidural analgesia had positive correlation with positive feelings, lower posttraumatic stress levels and earlier first feeding after delivery. A systematic review of the literature examining the unintended maternal, fetal, and neonatal effects of epidural analgesia used for pain relief in labor by low-risk women confirmed that epidural is associated with a lower rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery, a higher rate of instrumental vaginal delivery and longer labors, particularly in nulliparous women [49].…”
Section: Laborduration(hours)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Neuraxial analgesia in nulliparous women has been associated with a slower active labor [6]. These data have been largely supported by observational studies about the first and second stages [7]. Evidence from randomized control trials suggests that only the second stage is prolonged by epidural analgesia, and is not conclusive about the first stage [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En effet, les effets de l'analgé sie pé ridurale sur le dé roulement du travail sont toujours dé battus dans la litté rature. Les é tudes randomisé es publié es [20][21][22][23] ne permettent pas de conclure dé finitivement sur l'influence de l'analgé sie pé ridurale sur le taux de cé sarienne. Une mé ta-analyse de la Cochrane Database comparant l'analgé sie pé ridurale et celle par opiacé s montrait une tendance à l'augmentation du taux de cé sarienne dans le groupe bé né ficiant d'une analgé sie pé ridurale (Odds Ratio 1,30 ; IC95 % 0,93-1,83) ainsi qu'une augmentation significative de la duré e du travail, du besoin en ocytocique et du taux d'extraction instrumentale [24].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified