Unintended Consequences of Automated Vehicles and Pooling for Urban Transportation Systems

Abstract

Automated vehicles (AVs) have emerged rapidly in recent years, becoming a focus of high expectations and heated debates. Advocates argue that the arrival of AVs will make driving safer, greener, cheaper, and faster, bringing ubiquitous access to transportation while significantly reducing traffic congestion and environmental impacts. Skeptics, in contrast, suggest that the appeal of AVs will induce additional driving, offsetting or even overwhelming the positive effects of increased automation. Many analysts now believe that the solution lies in ensuring that most vehicle trips are shared to serve the same number of passenger miles with fewer vehicle miles, reducing traffic congestion. However, these analyses fail to recognize that reducing congestion will induce yet more demand for driving and attract riders from other transportation modes including public transit, which is already experiencing falling ridership in many cities. In this study, we explore the impact of AVs and pooling on consumer mode choice and the effect on the performance of both road and public transit systems. We show that the well‐intentioned move to promote pooling may have the unintended consequence of triggering a public transit death spiral, leading to both worse public transit quality and more rather than less traffic congestion. We argue that the deployment of AVs and pooling can be effective at accelerating the transition to sustainable urban mobility, but only when accompanied by policies that make driving less attractive, not more.

The hidden side of sustainable operations and supply chain management: unanticipated outcomes, trade-offs and tensions

“…The study by Tan et al (2017) in China found that enforcing environmental regulations often exacerbated opportunistic behavior at the expense of other stakeholders. The study by Naumov et al (2020) on automated vehicles found that carpooling initiatives could actually unintentionally result in making traffic congestion worse. Zarei et al (2019) found that even humanitarian supply chains have unintended consequences, where for example detrimental environmental outcomes are often neglected.…”

Coordination Behavior in Mode Choice: Laboratory Study of Equilibrium Transformation and Selection

“…Even though disruptive technologies, such as self‐driving cars, V2X communication, and electric vehicles, will eventually mature to the point that everyone can use them, they will also cause inevitable increases in traffic demand (Naumov et al. 2020, Qi and Shen 2019). Given these circumstances, sustainable mobility strategies should be used to motivate private car users to choose low‐emission travel modes, such as public transport, to reduce the negative effects of transportation systems on transportation infrastructure and the environment.…”

Does the Sharing Economy Technology Disrupt Incumbents? Exploring the Influences of Mobile Digital Freight Matching Platforms on Road Freight Logistics Firms

“…When production and operations management entered the era of Industry 4.0, innovations of digital technologies and automation technologies, such as cloud computing (Arbabian et al 2021), AI and machine learning (Simester et al 2020), blockchain (Babich and Hilary 2020), data analytics (Choi et al 2018), and autonomous vehicles (Naumov et al 2020), have reshaped many industries (Dai et al 2020) and have caught scholars' attention.…”