2012
DOI: 10.1111/faf.12003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unintended consequences and trade‐offs of fish passage

Abstract: We synthesized evidence for unintended consequences and trade‐offs associated with the passage of fishes. Provisioning of fish passageways at dams and dam removals are being carried out increasingly as resource managers seek ways to reduce fragmentation of migratory fish populations and restore biodiversity and nature‐like ecosystem services in tributaries altered by dams. The benefits of provisioning upstream passage are highlighted widely. Possible unwanted consequences and trade‐offs of upstream passage are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
173
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
173
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our model does not account for tributary habitat conditions, the spatial distribution of beneficiary species, or the likelihood of species invasions, all of which mediate the ecological benefits of barrier removals (28,29). Unfortunately, these important management considerations have not been systematically mapped across the entire GLB, so they cannot be incorporated into current optimization models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model does not account for tributary habitat conditions, the spatial distribution of beneficiary species, or the likelihood of species invasions, all of which mediate the ecological benefits of barrier removals (28,29). Unfortunately, these important management considerations have not been systematically mapped across the entire GLB, so they cannot be incorporated into current optimization models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering river reconnection schemes, we suggest that increasing emphasis needs to be placed upon ensuring whole fish community access (Gough et al 2012;Cooke and Hinch 2013), unless there is a need to preclude invasive species (McLaughlin et al 2013). Often, fish passage studies assess a modified facility only for stronger…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish passages have been a major measure to mitigate the effects of blocking fish habitat and fragmenting fish populations (Williams et al 2012;Cooke and Hinch 2013;McLaughlin et al 2013). The efficiency of fish passages depends on the swimming ability of the target species (Gowans et al 2003;Roscoe and Hinch 2010;Noonan et al 2012).…”
Section: Fish Passagesmentioning
confidence: 99%