Handbook of Enumerative Combinatorics 2015
DOI: 10.1201/b18255-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unimodality, Log-concavity, Real-rootedness And Beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many efforts have been deployed in recent years for classifying them, see e.g. the surveys [27] and [30] and the references therein. The generating functions of lattice walks are not only intriguing for combinatorial reasons, but also from the perspective of computer algebra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many efforts have been deployed in recent years for classifying them, see e.g. the surveys [27] and [30] and the references therein. The generating functions of lattice walks are not only intriguing for combinatorial reasons, but also from the perspective of computer algebra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. A sequence of K + 1 points in Z M +1 is called lattice path of K steps [18]. Random walks over sites of Simp (N ) Z M +1 are defined by a set of admissible steps Ω M (step set Ω M ) so that at each step an i th coordinate m i increases by unity, while the nearest neighbouring one decreases by unity.…”
Section: It Satisfies the Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of random walks [14,18,31,32] are of considerable recent interest due to their role in quantum information processing [10,29]. The walks on multi-dimensional lattices were studied by many authors [4,23,24,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the enumeration of simple lattice paths (allowing just the jumps −1, 0, and +1), many methods are often used, like e.g. the Lagrange inversion, determinant techniques, continued fractions, orthogonal polynomials, bijective proofs, and a lot is known in such cases [32,45,52,54]. These nice methods do not apply to more complex cases of more generic jumps (or, if one adds a spacial boundary, like a line of rational slope).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%