2018
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2018.2877620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unimanual Versus Bimanual Motor Imagery Classifiers for Assistive and Rehabilitative Brain Computer Interfaces

Abstract: Bimanual movements are an integral part of everyday activities and are often included in rehabilitation therapies. Yet electroencephalography (EEG) based assistive and rehabilitative brain computer interface (BCI) systems typically rely on motor imagination (MI) of one limb at the time. In this study we present a classifier which discriminates between uni-and bimanual MI. Ten able bodied participants took part in cue based motor execution (ME) and MI tasks of the left (L), right (R) and both (B) hands. A 32 ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Active training with autonomous involvement has been made possible by monitoring electromyography (EMG) signals in the affected foot. Recent interest in upper limb rehabilitation has included electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, including the proposal of several motor imagery (MI) based rehabilitation systems [6], [7], [8]. A clinical study showed substantial improvement of arm motor function in an MI rehabilitation group, compared to a passive control group [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active training with autonomous involvement has been made possible by monitoring electromyography (EMG) signals in the affected foot. Recent interest in upper limb rehabilitation has included electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, including the proposal of several motor imagery (MI) based rehabilitation systems [6], [7], [8]. A clinical study showed substantial improvement of arm motor function in an MI rehabilitation group, compared to a passive control group [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In offline decoding, MAP-CNN outperformed the best conventional method with the improvement of 20.9% and 8.6% in ME and MI, respectively, for four classes including no-movement. i) CSP [31], [32]: Features and extracted by CSP on EEG data of time window 0-4 s at Hz band. LDA was used to enable the separation of the data into classes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem can be solved either by directly applying multiclass methods, such as naive Bayesian classifiers (Suk and Lee, 2012;Zhang et al, 2015) or multilayer perceptrons (Balakrishnan and Puthusserypady, 2005), or, as more commonly used, by decomposing the problem into several binary classifications (Lotte et al, 2018). There are different possible decomposition methods, e.g., pairwise classification (Vuckovic et al, 2018) or by hierarchical classification (Dong et al, 2017;Gundelakh et al, 2018). However, all studies have relatively low binary classification accuracies in common ranging from 50 to 70%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%