2019
DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.12.s157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unilateral Synchronous Multiple Kidney Tumors Managed by Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Five-year Follow-up

Abstract: Unilateral synchronous multifocal renal tumors are rare. Due to the limited data in the literature and challenges in the technique, there is still doubt on the application of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for the management of such tumors. Herein, we report a 36-year male patient presenting with right-sided flank pain and microscopic hematuria. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed five solid masses, the largest of which was 27 x 18 mm. The patient underwent LPN and the largest mass was resected… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PN is relatively difficult for multiple lesion resection and renal reconstruction. For unilateral multifocal renal tumors, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has been proven safe and feasible with acceptable oncological results and complication rates in selected patients[ 6 , 7 ]. For USMRC cT1 stage, PN can prevent unnecessary renal unit damage and achieve the same effect as RN, and postoperative quality of life in patients is better[ 8 - 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PN is relatively difficult for multiple lesion resection and renal reconstruction. For unilateral multifocal renal tumors, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has been proven safe and feasible with acceptable oncological results and complication rates in selected patients[ 6 , 7 ]. For USMRC cT1 stage, PN can prevent unnecessary renal unit damage and achieve the same effect as RN, and postoperative quality of life in patients is better[ 8 - 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%