2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unilateral parietal brain injury increases risk-taking on a rat gambling task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first study assessed the effects of a bilateral frontal TBI delivered either before (“acquisition” condition), or after (“trained” condition), learning the RGT ( Shaver et al, 2019 ). The second assessed the effects of a unilateral TBI on acquisition of RGT learning ( Ozga-Hess et al, 2020 ). The remaining two are in preparation for publication, but both used bilateral frontal TBI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The first study assessed the effects of a bilateral frontal TBI delivered either before (“acquisition” condition), or after (“trained” condition), learning the RGT ( Shaver et al, 2019 ). The second assessed the effects of a unilateral TBI on acquisition of RGT learning ( Ozga-Hess et al, 2020 ). The remaining two are in preparation for publication, but both used bilateral frontal TBI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rats were trained as previously reported on the RGT ( Zeeb and Winstanley, 2013 ; Shaver et al, 2019 ; Ozga-Hess et al, 2020 ). In brief, nosepoking behavior was shaped by reinforcing pokes to an illuminated hole.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are, however, conflicting findings on how lesion location impacts decision-making. In mice, for example, spatially non-specific associations have been found between unilateral parietal and bilateral frontal lesions, on the one hand, and riskier decision-making and increased impulsivity, on the other hand [91,92]. By contrast, however, human studies indicate that decision-making deficits are not limited to cases involving frontal lesions [93].…”
Section: Decision-making Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 99%