1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-328x(97)00239-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unilateral nerve injury down-regulates mRNA for Na+ channel SCN10A bilaterally in rat dorsal root ganglia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that without corresponding functional data, definitively interpreting the physiological meaning of these specific patterns of subunit expression is difficult. It is well documented that bilateral physiological changes occur after unilateral nerve injuries (Calford and Tweedale, 1990, 1991; Clarey et al, 1996; Oaklander and Belzberg, 1997; Oaklander and Brown, 2004). Therefore we cannot rule out that control measurements include injury induced physiological changes to subunit expression via contralateral cortico-cortical connectivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that without corresponding functional data, definitively interpreting the physiological meaning of these specific patterns of subunit expression is difficult. It is well documented that bilateral physiological changes occur after unilateral nerve injuries (Calford and Tweedale, 1990, 1991; Clarey et al, 1996; Oaklander and Belzberg, 1997; Oaklander and Brown, 2004). Therefore we cannot rule out that control measurements include injury induced physiological changes to subunit expression via contralateral cortico-cortical connectivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) In deprived area 3b, GluR2/3 staining intensity is decreased relative to control values across all cortical layers for both somata and neuropil. Bilateral consequences of unilateral sensory manipulations have been rather widely reported (e.g., Calford and Tweedale, 1990, 1991; Clarey et al, 1996; Kozin et al, 1976; Oaklander and Belzberg, 1997; Oaklander and Brown, 2004; Vergara-Aragon et al, 2003), with the ipsilateral effects tending to mirror those found contralaterally (e.g., Calford and Tweedale, 1990; Oaklander and Brown, 2004). In the present study, there are clear differences between the contralateral and ipsilateral hemispheres, suggesting either that there are no changes in the ipsilateral cortex or that they are in the opposite direction of those in the contralateral cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of a gene encoding a TTX-resistant Na ϩ channel confirmed the electrophysiological data indicating the existence of unique Na ϩ currents in a subpopulation of primary afferent neurons. The first TTX-resistant Na ϩ channel cloned, referred to as SNS (32), PN3 (33), and subsequently ScN10 (34), is only present in primary afferent neurons, in particular, a subpopulation of primary afferent neurons with small-diameter cell bodies. Heterologous expression of SNS/ PN3 indicated that this clone encodes a voltage-gated Na ϩ channel with biophysical properties similar to those of the TTX-resistant channels present in sensory neurons (32,33).…”
Section: Why Ttx-resistant Channels?mentioning
confidence: 99%