2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unilateral and bilateral projections from cortical cells to the inferior colliculus in guinea pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
41
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
41
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A change in the balance between LTP and LTD may explain the decreased responsiveness of ACx in sound-deprived mice (21) and the decline of electrically evoked responses observed in congenitally deaf cats (45). L5 synaptic plasticity may have a significant impact on subthalamic processing because of the massive descending projection from ACx (28,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50). Furthermore, the specific complement of cortical plasticity mechanisms may support the functional takeover of ACx by other sensory modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A change in the balance between LTP and LTD may explain the decreased responsiveness of ACx in sound-deprived mice (21) and the decline of electrically evoked responses observed in congenitally deaf cats (45). L5 synaptic plasticity may have a significant impact on subthalamic processing because of the massive descending projection from ACx (28,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50). Furthermore, the specific complement of cortical plasticity mechanisms may support the functional takeover of ACx by other sensory modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Double labeling experiments yielded no evidence for collateral projections to both targets among layer V cells (Wong and Kelly, 1981). A few scattered cortical cells located in layer VI next to the white matter project to the IC (Doucet et al, 2003;Bajo and Moore, 2005;Coomes et al, 2005), and it cannot be ruled out that these cells are among the layer VI cells that also project to the thalamus. Given their very small numbers relative to the numbers of cells in layer V, however, it does not seem likely that they would represent a significant source of inputs to the MG.…”
Section: Other Potential Sources Of the Bda-labeled Terminals And Axomentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, blocking the A1 may impair both auditory object/ feature-based attention and auditory spatial attention, leading to that attention-impaired rats do not exhibit any attentional modulations of PPI. Moreover, the A1 sends descending axonal projections to some important relay sites in the pathway mediating PPI, including the IC (Herbert et al, 1991;Druga et al, 1997;Coomes et al, 2005;Schofield, 2009), pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg), and laterodorsal tegmental nucleus (Schofield and Motts, 2009;Schofield, 2010). Thus, the A1 may directly mediate the top-down modulations of PPI via its direct projections to the PPI pathway.…”
Section: Contributions Of the A1mentioning
confidence: 99%