Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.4230/lipics.csl.2020.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unifying Cubical Models of Univalent Type Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the base category. As such, it can in principle represent many different type theory extensions like guarded recursion [10,20], parametricity [1,2,4,33,30], univalence [6,12,15], nominal [34] and directed [36] type theory, etc., as well as combinations of these [11,41].…”
Section: Multimode Type Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…the base category. As such, it can in principle represent many different type theory extensions like guarded recursion [10,20], parametricity [1,2,4,33,30], univalence [6,12,15], nominal [34] and directed [36] type theory, etc., as well as combinations of these [11,41].…”
Section: Multimode Type Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first function takes two syntactic modes and either provides a proof that these modes are syntactically equal or results in a type error if they are not. 12 The second function is the long awaited specification of the modality equivalence relation ≃ m , not as a predicate but as a sound decision procedure. As such, it tests whether two syntactic modalities of the same domain and codomain are equivalent, and if so, it produces a proof that the modalities' interpretations as DRAs are equivalent.…”
Section: Ctx : Ctxexprmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As all constructions in this section must be stable, it makes sense to work internally to Ô. This style has been previously used in normalization proofs [Coquand 2019] and also in the metatheory of cubical type theories [Cavallo et al 2020;Licata et al 2018;Orton and Pitts 2016].…”
Section: Working In ômentioning
confidence: 99%