2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.86.067301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unifying all mass discrepancies with one effective gravity law?

Abstract: A remarkably tight relation is observed between the Newtonian gravity sourced by the baryons and the actual gravity in galaxies of all sizes. This can be interpreted as the effect of a single effective force law depending on acceleration. This is however not the case in larger systems with much deeper potential wells, such as galaxy clusters. Here we explore the possibility of an effective force law reproducing mass discrepancies in all extragalactic systems when depending on both acceleration and the depth of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sanders 2003). One possible solution is Extended MOND (EMOND, Zhao & Famaey 2012) which posits that the acceleration scale a 0 increases with the potential depth |Φ| such that it has the standard value of 1.2 × 10 −10 m/s 2 for |Φ| Φ0 but is larger in regions with a deeper potential, such as galaxy clusters. So far, this appears to be a promising way to resolve the difficulties typically faced by MOND in such systems (Hodson & Zhao 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanders 2003). One possible solution is Extended MOND (EMOND, Zhao & Famaey 2012) which posits that the acceleration scale a 0 increases with the potential depth |Φ| such that it has the standard value of 1.2 × 10 −10 m/s 2 for |Φ| Φ0 but is larger in regions with a deeper potential, such as galaxy clusters. So far, this appears to be a promising way to resolve the difficulties typically faced by MOND in such systems (Hodson & Zhao 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum amplitude of A0 has been detected observationally as discussed in (Zhao and Famaey, 2012;Hodson and Zhao, 2017). By the way, Tully-Fisher relation normalization factor is limited to a maximum A0 as A0,m.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Another assumption, it is massive neutrinos (Sanders, 2003;Angus et al, 2008). Bekenstein (2011) proposed that the Milgrom constant a0 is a monotonically increasing function of potential depth Which boosts the Milgrom MOND in galaxy clusters by a factor of a few, and Zhao and Famaey (2012) have proposed EMOND to resolve the puzzle of clusters by handy effective changes in the Migrom MOND as a generalized Milgrom constant…”
Section: The Discrepancy By External and Internal Field Effects And Tully-fisher Relation Discrepancy In Context Of The Observable Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One recent proposal goes under the name of Extended MOND or EMOND (Zhao & Famaey, 2012). The idea is to make the MOND acceleration scale a 0 a function of the gravitational potential A 0 (F) so as to be able to retrieve higher accelerations for galaxy clusters within EMOND.…”
Section: The Upscaling Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%