2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-83582011000400025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniformidade de deposição de gotas de pulverização em plantas de amendoim e Brachiaria plantaginea

Abstract: RESUMO -Objetivou-se neste trabalho avaliar a uniformidade da deposição de gotas de pulverização em plantas de amendoim e de Brachiaria plantaginea localizadas nas linhas e entrelinhas de semeadura da cultura. O experimento de campo foi realizado com a cultura de amendoim, cultivar IAC Tatu . Utilizou-se o delineamento experimental em blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições. Para as análises qualitativas, os dados obtidos foram ajustados à curva de regressão pelo modelo de Gompertz. As pontas XR 11002 VS (200 L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, different plant protection products present in spray solutions can increase or reduce their adhesion on targets (BARBOSA et al, 2013) and hence change the degree of difficulty of marker removal. Another uncertain factor is the water volume used to wash targets: 20 mL for coffee leaves (SCUDELER et al, 2004), 40 mL for citrus leaves (PALLADINI et al, 2005), 20 and 30 mL in soybean leaves (PINTO et al, 2007 andPRADO et al, 2015, respectively), 50 mL for artificial target (SASAKI et al, 2013), 100 mL for tomato leaves (ZAMBIANCO, 2013), and 100 and 150 mL for peanut and Brachiaria plantaginea leaves (RODRIGUES-COSTA et al, 2011). In addition to this removal volume variability, there are no studies in the literature demonstrating the efficiency of a single washing for a complete removal of a marker (dye).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different plant protection products present in spray solutions can increase or reduce their adhesion on targets (BARBOSA et al, 2013) and hence change the degree of difficulty of marker removal. Another uncertain factor is the water volume used to wash targets: 20 mL for coffee leaves (SCUDELER et al, 2004), 40 mL for citrus leaves (PALLADINI et al, 2005), 20 and 30 mL in soybean leaves (PINTO et al, 2007 andPRADO et al, 2015, respectively), 50 mL for artificial target (SASAKI et al, 2013), 100 mL for tomato leaves (ZAMBIANCO, 2013), and 100 and 150 mL for peanut and Brachiaria plantaginea leaves (RODRIGUES-COSTA et al, 2011). In addition to this removal volume variability, there are no studies in the literature demonstrating the efficiency of a single washing for a complete removal of a marker (dye).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%