1977
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.16.255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform susceptibilities of metallic elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

28
377
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 808 publications
(418 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
28
377
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This places the compound at a Stoner instability. [22,23] This is the reason for the marginal ferromagnetic instability, mentioned above. The calculated bare specific heat coefficient from the density of states is γ bare =4.8 mJ/mol K 2 on a per formula unit basis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This places the compound at a Stoner instability. [22,23] This is the reason for the marginal ferromagnetic instability, mentioned above. The calculated bare specific heat coefficient from the density of states is γ bare =4.8 mJ/mol K 2 on a per formula unit basis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the basis of the Stoner theory, which assumes rigid shifts of the d bands on forming ferromagnetic moments. [36,37,39,40] It is a feature of both local moment and itinerant transition metal magnets, and is seen for example in the itinerant antiferromagnet Cr. [41] Importantly, comparing the A-type and S3 densities of states, it is clear that they similarly differ over the range of the d bands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be interesting to compare this with experiment to determine the specific heat renormalization, which is γ/γ bare ∼10 in the germanide superconductor, YFe 2 Ge 2 . [20] Since N (E F ) comes from d bands, the Stoner criterion for itinerant magnetism [36,37] is clearly exceeded, and so the nonspin-polarized state is unstable against magnetism at the DFT level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just above the gap it varies from zero to about 50 states/Ry/Fe-atom within 3 mRy. In bcc Fe N(E F ) is smaller than this peak value, but clearly sufficient to put Fe beyond the limit of infinite S [31]. This fact is important for an understanding of the unusual increase of N ef f (E, T ) when T is increased, and for the transformation of FeSi from a semi-conductor at low T to an exchange enhanced para-magnet above room temperature.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%