2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1571-0661(04)80534-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform Solution of Parity Games on Prefix-Recognizable Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We prove that already the reachability problem on prefix-recognizable graphs is EXP-hard. Since solving parity games on prefix-recognizable is in EXP [3], it immediately follows that alternating reachability is in EXP too. Thus surprisingly, both reachability 0020-0190/$ -see front matter © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prove that already the reachability problem on prefix-recognizable graphs is EXP-hard. Since solving parity games on prefix-recognizable is in EXP [3], it immediately follows that alternating reachability is in EXP too. Thus surprisingly, both reachability 0020-0190/$ -see front matter © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes e.g. decidability of monadic second order logic [9] and the existence of uniform winning strategies for parity games [6]. The decidability questions for bisimilarity are, however, more intricate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, he proposed an effective construction of an alternating automaton recognizing precisely the winning configurations. Cachat also states in [1] that the set of winning positions for parity games is regular. The proof of [1] is only sketched and the cmoplexity of the computation is not clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cachat also states in [1] that the set of winning positions for parity games is regular. The proof of [1] is only sketched and the cmoplexity of the computation is not clear. Note that the results of this paper were found independently of [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation