2000
DOI: 10.1090/memo/0687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform rectifiability and quasiminimizing sets of arbitrary codimension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
171
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
171
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the data are modeled as a manifold, possibly corrupted by noise, we can define the intrinsic dimension, at least locally, as the dimension of the manifold. There is a large body of literature at the intersection between harmonic analysis and geometric measure theory ( [77,26,27,28] and references therein) that explores and connect the behavior of multiscale quantities, such as Jones' β-numbers [77], with quantitative notions of rectifiability. This body of work has been our major inspiration.…”
Section: Overview Of Previous Work On Dimension Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the data are modeled as a manifold, possibly corrupted by noise, we can define the intrinsic dimension, at least locally, as the dimension of the manifold. There is a large body of literature at the intersection between harmonic analysis and geometric measure theory ( [77,26,27,28] and references therein) that explores and connect the behavior of multiscale quantities, such as Jones' β-numbers [77], with quantitative notions of rectifiability. This body of work has been our major inspiration.…”
Section: Overview Of Previous Work On Dimension Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inspiration for the current work originates from ideas in classical statistics (principal component analysis), dimension estimation of point clouds (see Section 2.1, 7 and references therein) and attractors of dynamical systems [23,24,25], and geometric measure theory [26,27,28], especially at its intersection with harmonic analysis. The ability of these tools to quantify and characterize geometric properties of rough sets of interest in harmonic analysis, suggests that they may be successfully adapted to the analysis of sampled noisy point clouds, where sampling and noise may be thought of as new types of (stochastic) perturbations not considered in the classical theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But G = G × 0x, then by [3, 8.3], G is a minimal cone in H, centered at x. Since H is a 3-plane, we must have that G is a 2-dimensional minimal cone of type P, Y or T and then G is also a 3-dimensional minimal cone of type P, Y or T. Next, as G is a blow-up limit of F at x, by [3,7.31], we have θ…”
Section: 43)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where the last line is obtained from the fact that E is Alhfors-regular (see [7]). Now (3.1.7) contradicts the hypothesis that E is MS-minimal, we thus obtain the lemma.…”
Section: 43)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general idea, as in [Se2], [DS2], and Section 12 of [DS3], is to require some property of topological nature (i.e., for instance, invariant under deformations) that would automatically imply that E is at least d-dimensional. Connectedness (in dimension d = 1), as in the result of Bishop and Jones, would be an example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%