2010
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform prostate imaging and spectroscopy at 7 T: comparison between a microstrip array and an endorectal coil

Abstract: An endorectal coil and an eight-element microstrip array were compared for prostate imaging at 7 T. An extensive radiofrequency safety assessment was performed with the use of finite difference time domain simulations to determine safe scan parameters. These simulations showed that the endorectal coil can deliver substantially more B(1)(+) to the prostate than can the microstrip array within the specific absorption rate safety guidelines. However, the B(1)(+) field of the endorectal coil is very inhomogeneous,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finite difference time domain (FDTD) calculations were performed using a home‐built software package developed based on methods explained in the study of van den Bergen et al (14). The simulations were performed to calculate B 1 + and B 1 − fields in a uniform phantom as well as in a realistic model of the human prostate (7, 14) for both the loop and the stripline elements. The electrical and magnetic radiofrequency fields were calculated, from which the SAR distribution and B 1 + fields were derived.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite difference time domain (FDTD) calculations were performed using a home‐built software package developed based on methods explained in the study of van den Bergen et al (14). The simulations were performed to calculate B 1 + and B 1 − fields in a uniform phantom as well as in a realistic model of the human prostate (7, 14) for both the loop and the stripline elements. The electrical and magnetic radiofrequency fields were calculated, from which the SAR distribution and B 1 + fields were derived.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They applied an endorectal transceiver coil system and a pulse sequence with slice selective adiabatic refocusing pulses [63]. Recent publications have mainly focused on the optimization of coil systems for ultra-high-field prostate imaging, as deeply localized organs are known to be challenging with respect to spin excitation and signal reception [64,65]. Van den Bergen et al proposed the application of a microstrip array for structural prostate imaging and an endorectal coil for spectroscopy for a full anatomical and functional prostate examination at 7 T [65].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent publications have mainly focused on the optimization of coil systems for ultra-high-field prostate imaging, as deeply localized organs are known to be challenging with respect to spin excitation and signal reception [64,65]. Van den Bergen et al proposed the application of a microstrip array for structural prostate imaging and an endorectal coil for spectroscopy for a full anatomical and functional prostate examination at 7 T [65]. Ipek et al recently published their results on two different radiative antenna designs employing relative permittivities of 37 and 90 for the antenna substrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local transceiver (TX/RX) and multi-channel transmission arrays in conjunction with multi-channel local receive arrays have been suggested as possible solutions. Eminent developments put building blocks to use consisting of stripline elements [41][42][43][44][45], electrical dipoles [45][46][47][48][49][50][51], dielectric resonant antennas [52], slot antennas [53], and loop elements [54][55][56][57][58][59]. Rigid, flexible and modular configurations have been exploited.…”
Section: Challenges and Technical Solutions For Cardiac Mri At Ultrahmentioning
confidence: 99%