2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00271-020-00712-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform fertilization method based on differential pressure tank with optimal fertilizer concentration and constant fertigation flux

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the significant impact of working pressure on the flow rate of the emitter, the pressure difference between the inlet and outlet of the aeration and fertilization tank has no significant impact on the flow rate of the emitter. This is because the pressure difference between the inlet and outlet of the fertilization tank mainly affects the uniformity of fertilization and cannot change the inlet pressure of the emitter flow channel [23]. This result is consistent with the research of Fan Junliang et al [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Compared with the significant impact of working pressure on the flow rate of the emitter, the pressure difference between the inlet and outlet of the aeration and fertilization tank has no significant impact on the flow rate of the emitter. This is because the pressure difference between the inlet and outlet of the fertilization tank mainly affects the uniformity of fertilization and cannot change the inlet pressure of the emitter flow channel [23]. This result is consistent with the research of Fan Junliang et al [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Yang Xin [21] and others found that the flow rate and differential pressure is a power function of the mathematical relationship between the role of the increase in differential pressure leads to a subsequent increase in the flow rate, while the concentration of fertilizer out of the mouth of the fertilizer with the change in time is an exponential decrease, but also so that it is concluded that the amount of fertilizer applied to the case of too high and too low and small differential pressure is not conducive to the uniform distribution of fertilizer under the drip irrigation system. Hu Xinyu [22] and others pointed out that the traditional differential pressure fertilization tank fertilizer application process of about 70% to 80% of the fertilizer belongs to the range of over-fertilizer or insufficient fertilization, the team verified the feasibility of using computer control with the electric control valve to achieve the control of the uniformity of fertilizer, but there are cumbersome operation, the high cost of the problem.…”
Section: Differential Pressure Tank Fertilizer Applicatorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the formula, V is the volume of the mixed liquid; H b is the density of alkali in the mixture; H x is the density of biogas slurry in the device; L x is the volume of biogas slurry; L b is the input amount of alkaline solution, and L b = t × L n , where t is the time for starting the pump and L n is the flow rate of alkali solution per minute each time the pump starts; L in is the input flow rate within the system device; K b is the weak base ionization equilibrium constant, and PK b = − log(K b ); and pH is a variable in output process [6,7,17,18].…”
Section: Modifying the Ph Of Biogas Production During Dry Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the research on optimizing nonlinear intelligent control algorithms, feedback control and adaptive control methods are mostly used. The T-S fuzzy controller used in this investigation has difficulty handling time-varying and delayed environmental pH control, and more efficient and fast optimization algorithms need to be studied [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%