1983
DOI: 10.1002/mana.19831140114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform Estimates for the ∂-Equation on Pseudoconvex Polyhedra on Stein Manifolds

Abstract: Uniform estimates for the &equation on strictly pseudoconvex smooth domains in Cn were obtained in 1969/70 by G R A U E R T~E B [2], HENKIN Ell], KERZW [5], [0], ~E B 171, and OVRELID [8]. RANGE and Sm generalized these results to p i e c e h e smooth strictly paeudoconvex domains. HENKIN proved uniform estimates a180 for non-degenerated WEIL polyhedra [ 121, [ 131. HENKIN and SERGEJEV [ 101 obtained such estimates for a certain class of so-called pseudoconvex polyhedra which contains the eaaes mentioned above… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main ingredient of the proof of Theorem 2.4 is uniform estimates for solutions of certain ∂-equations on M . In fact, similar estimates are valid on coverings of so-called nondegenerate pseudoconvex polyhedrons on Stein manifolds (see [SH80] and [Heu83] for their definition). This class contains, in particular, piecewise strictly pseudoconvex domains and non-degenerate analytic polyhedrons on Stein manifolds.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main ingredient of the proof of Theorem 2.4 is uniform estimates for solutions of certain ∂-equations on M . In fact, similar estimates are valid on coverings of so-called nondegenerate pseudoconvex polyhedrons on Stein manifolds (see [SH80] and [Heu83] for their definition). This class contains, in particular, piecewise strictly pseudoconvex domains and non-degenerate analytic polyhedrons on Stein manifolds.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…(2) Using the main result of [Heu83] and the estimates from [SH80] one can show that the result of Proposition 5.1 is also valid for coverings of non-degenerate pseudoconvex polyhedrons on Stein manifolds (see [Heu83] and [SH80] for the definition).…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Remmert embedding theorem (see, e.g., [10]) we may assume without loss of generality that M is a closed complex submanifold of some C p . Then according to [14,Lemma 1], there exist a strongly pseudoconvex domain W ⊂ C p with C 2 boundary such that W ∩ M = Ω and a holomorphic map π from a neighbourhood U ofW onto U ∩ M such that π(W ) = Ω and π| U ∩M is the identity map. From here by the covering homotopy theorem, see, e.g., [16], we obtain that for every unbranched covering r : Ω → Ω there exist an unbranched covering q : W → W and holomorphic maps π : W → Ω and i : Ω → W such that π • i = Id and r • π = π • q.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Theorem 1 holds for strictly pseudoconvex domains, defined as above, on STEIW manifolds. It is possible to reduce this problem t o the case of domains in C" using the simple method of such reduction from [4].…”
Section: : = ( Z E U : E ( Z ) -O } mentioning
confidence: 99%