1991
DOI: 10.1080/03605309108820797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform estimates and blow–up behavior for solutions of −δ(u)=v(x)euin two dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
813
3
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 596 publications
(837 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
15
813
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easily checked that the solutions (1.2) correspond exactly to this description in the case Ω = D. It is interesting to mention the analogy existing between this result and the problem −∆u = λe u under Dirichlet boundary conditions, whose solutions with λ Ω e u uniformly bounded have become well understood after the works [10,2,8]. It follows from those results that concentration occurs in the form λe u 8π δ ξj .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It is easily checked that the solutions (1.2) correspond exactly to this description in the case Ω = D. It is interesting to mention the analogy existing between this result and the problem −∆u = λe u under Dirichlet boundary conditions, whose solutions with λ Ω e u uniformly bounded have become well understood after the works [10,2,8]. It follows from those results that concentration occurs in the form λe u 8π δ ξj .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…follows from equation (4) multiplied by |ξ| 2 and from the integrability of u given by (6) and (8). Mimicking a standard computation for the parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel system by writing v = − 1 2 π log(·) * u +ṽ, the above identity reads [5,8] for more details.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as pointed out in [5], there are regions, for example, the rectangles when the ratio between the sides is large enough, for which the concentration does not occur, so there is at least one solution for (1.1-2) with λ = 8π . The problem (1.1-2) also has other interesting features, which are different from other nonlinear problems like Nirenberg's problem (see [15]) and the scalar curvature problem (see [2]); in particular the blow-up analysis of H.Brezis and F.Merle [3]. In fact, for (1.1-2) we do have multiple bubbles [12] and when K = 1 , S.Baraket and F.Pacard [26] construct them by using the fixed point theorem.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then there is a subsequence of {ξ n } , still denoted by {ξ n } satisfying either (i) We remark that the original statement of Theorem 3 in [3] is different from the form above, but their argument can be modified to cover this case. Now we recall some well-known facts including the Pohozaev identities.…”
Section: Vol 76 (2001)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation