Volume 8 Number 2 2012
DOI: 10.18057/ijasc.2012.8.2.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform Corrosion Wastage Effects on the Load-Carrying Capacity of Damaged Steel Beams

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of uniform corrosion on the load-carrying capacity of steel beam sections. In this paper, a credible corrosion model for damaged steel beams has been developed based on the real existing data. Thickness loss data were compiled from corrosion damaged samples beams which picked up from a petrochemical industry. The developed deteriorated model was employed to demonstrate the effects of uniform corrosion on the structural behavior of damaged stee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is stress range related to a stress spectrum in a short test period; 1 k is the adjustment factor considering eccentricity of vertical load; 2 k is the adjustment factor of considering some special heavy train which do not operate in short-term test period; 3 k is the stress conversion factor between the evaluated detail and the actual test detail; 4 k is the adjustment factor of considering the difference of locomotive and vehicle types between the test period and the service period (If the stress history is directly corrected by referencing to pervious similar test or simulating calculation, 4 k is taken as 1.0. ); 5 k is the adjustment factor of considering secondary stress.…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…is stress range related to a stress spectrum in a short test period; 1 k is the adjustment factor considering eccentricity of vertical load; 2 k is the adjustment factor of considering some special heavy train which do not operate in short-term test period; 3 k is the stress conversion factor between the evaluated detail and the actual test detail; 4 k is the adjustment factor of considering the difference of locomotive and vehicle types between the test period and the service period (If the stress history is directly corrected by referencing to pervious similar test or simulating calculation, 4 k is taken as 1.0. ); 5 k is the adjustment factor of considering secondary stress.…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the number of stress cycle related to a stress spectrum in a short test period; 1  is the adjustment factor of considering the different daily traffic volume within one month; 2  is the adjustment factor of considering the different monthly traffic volume within one year; 3  is the adjustment factor of considering the different yearly traffic volume during entire service period; 4  is the adjustment factor corresponding to vehicles gross weight change in every train, which closely linked to the locomotive traction gross weight, and is given in Table 1. After correcting the stress range and their numbers of cycles in each operation period, the operation stress range spectrum during bridge service condition can be determined.…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fatigue behavior and bearing capacity are greatly influenced by the coupled actions of material degradation, vehicle load and environment [1]. Thus, it is necessary to find a method for fatigue analysis that considers real traffic load history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%