2006
DOI: 10.1002/mana.200410462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform convergence for elliptic problems on varying domains

Abstract: Let Ω ⊂ ℝN be (Wiener) regular. For λ > 0 and f ∈ L ∞(ℝN ) there is a unique bounded, continuous function u: ℝN → ℝ solving λu – Ωu = f  in 𝔻(Ω)′,  u = 0 on ℝN \ Ω. Given open sets Ωn we introduce the notion of regular convergence of Ωn to Ω as n → ∞. It implies that the solutions u n of (P  Ω italicn ) converge (locally) uniformly to u on ℝN . Whereas L 2‐convergence has been treated in the literature, our criteria for uniform convergence are new. The notion of regular convergence is very general. F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the sequel of the paper, we make use several times of the following result, whose proof can be found in [3], Theorem 7.3.…”
Section: Notations and Abstract Genericity Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the sequel of the paper, we make use several times of the following result, whose proof can be found in [3], Theorem 7.3.…”
Section: Notations and Abstract Genericity Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We claim that each Λ k (t) converges, as t → +∞, to an eigenvalue of the Laplacian-Dirichlet operator onΩ. Indeed, the compact convergence of Ω t toΩ implies the strong convergence of the corresponding resolvent operators (see, for instance, [3]). This, in turns, guarantees that |λ …”
Section: Proposition 22 Let M > 2 and ωmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We show that the Leray-Schauder degree is persistent under domain perturbation. The proof is similar to the argument for periodic solutions of parabolic equations in [10,Theorem 7.1] or the argument for L ∞ solutions of elliptic equations in [2,Theorem 8.2]. However, we also consider perturbation of the nonlinear terms.…”
Section: Domain Perturbation For Bounded Solutions Of Semilinear Equamentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In Particular, if deg(I − Q, U, 0) = 0, then (5.1) has a C 0 (R, L 2 ( )) solution in U (see [21,Theorem 4.3.2]). We follow [2] to state a sequence of results below. Q, B(u, ε), 0).…”
Section: Domain Perturbation For Bounded Solutions Of Semilinear Equamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let f ∈ L ∞ (R N ). Then there exists a unique u ∈ H 1 0,loc ( ) ∩ L ∞ (R N ) (see [7]) solution of the Poisson equation…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%