1973
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1973.10489088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform Confidence Bands for a Quadratic Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this example involving quadratic regression, ch cannot be computed by using the method of Spurrier () and cc cannot be computed by using the method of Trout & Chow () since the required constraint on X is not satisfied. On the other hand, for the cornmeal example given in Spurrier (, pp.…”
Section: Numerical Examples In Dose Response Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For this example involving quadratic regression, ch cannot be computed by using the method of Spurrier () and cc cannot be computed by using the method of Trout & Chow () since the required constraint on X is not satisfied. On the other hand, for the cornmeal example given in Spurrier (, pp.…”
Section: Numerical Examples In Dose Response Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…318–319) with two replications at each of the five percentages of sucross and α=0.05, our program gives ch=3.3038 (taking less than 2 seconds) which agrees with the entry 3.304 of Spurrier , Table , with m=4, k=2 and 1α=95%). For the numerical example given in Trout & Chow (, p. 622) with (a,b)=(8,16) and α=0.05, our Matlab program gives cc=1.0923 (taking less than 3 seconds) while Trout and Chow gave cc=1.08 using their integration method and cc=1.10 from their interpolation. As pointed out in the Introduction, the methods of Spurrier () and Trout & Chow () involve a three‐dimensional integral and so are slower computationally than our method which involves a two‐dimensional integral.…”
Section: Numerical Examples In Dose Response Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations