2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified univariate and multivariate random field theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
325
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(330 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
325
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All group analyses were then carried out using FLAME (FMRIB's Local Analysis of Mixed Effects, stage 1 and stage 2 with automatic outlier detection; Woolrich, 2008). All contrasts were thresholded at Z > 2.3, followed by a cluster significance threshold of p = 0.05 adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Gaussian random-field theory method (Worsley, Taylor, Tomaiuolo, & Lerch, 2004).…”
Section: Group-level Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All group analyses were then carried out using FLAME (FMRIB's Local Analysis of Mixed Effects, stage 1 and stage 2 with automatic outlier detection; Woolrich, 2008). All contrasts were thresholded at Z > 2.3, followed by a cluster significance threshold of p = 0.05 adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Gaussian random-field theory method (Worsley, Taylor, Tomaiuolo, & Lerch, 2004).…”
Section: Group-level Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary application of this probability is to correct for multiple comparisons across the entire field, thereby affording field-level hypothesis testing (Worsley, Taylor, Tomaiuolo, and Lerch 2004;Friston, Ashburner, Kiebel, Nichols, and Penny 2007).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An entire separate review paper is needed to track all the RFT work produced, but a few highlights include: A unified result for Z, T , χ 2 and F images (Worsley et al, 1996); a solution for the conservativeness found at low smoothness (Worsley & Taylor, 2005); and a unified multivariate result from which all other results are special cases (Worsley et al, 2004). These (2003).…”
Section: Monte Carlomentioning
confidence: 99%