2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.100.025009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified no-scale model of modulus fixing, inflation, supersymmetry breaking, and dark energy

Abstract: We present a minimal SU(2,1)/SU(2)×U(1) no-scale model that unifies modulus fixing, Starobinsky-like inflation, an adjustable scale for supersymmetry breaking and the possibility of a small cosmological constant, a.k.a. dark energy.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We demonstrate in this paper the construction of a non-oscillatory, no-scale supergravity model of inflation (NO-NO inflation), whose predictions agree with the most recent cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements [37,38]. This model has a simple plateau inflationary potential, whose predictions are similar to those of the original Starobinsky model of inflation based on R + R 2 gravity [40] (see [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] for other Starobinsky-like mod-els in the context of no-scale supergravity), and the general framework can be extended easily to models of no-scale attractors [52], which we leave for future work. We note that plateau models of inflation with a minimum have also been studied in [53,54], where they were referred to as T-models.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We demonstrate in this paper the construction of a non-oscillatory, no-scale supergravity model of inflation (NO-NO inflation), whose predictions agree with the most recent cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements [37,38]. This model has a simple plateau inflationary potential, whose predictions are similar to those of the original Starobinsky model of inflation based on R + R 2 gravity [40] (see [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] for other Starobinsky-like mod-els in the context of no-scale supergravity), and the general framework can be extended easily to models of no-scale attractors [52], which we leave for future work. We note that plateau models of inflation with a minimum have also been studied in [53,54], where they were referred to as T-models.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…(18). In order to avoid these potential problems, we can follow the treatment presented in [31,44,52] and include an adjustable parameter for supersymmetry breaking and dark energy without invoking any additional fields. A full treatment of supersymmetry breaking and the electroweak transition lies beyond the scope of this paper and will be considered in future work.…”
Section: Non-oscillatory Effective Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For some recent attempts towards this direction see Refs. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to breaking supersymmetry with a Polonyi field, we can use the two fields in the inflationary sector to break supersymmetry, leaving a small residual vacuum energy that could be identified as dark energy. 94,115,129 Such models have been called unified no-scale attractors. We consider a simple case with a single modulus, T , and a single matter field, φ, that we associate with the inflaton, so that ξ = 2T − φ 2 /3.…”
Section: Unified No-scale Attractorsmentioning
confidence: 99%