2018
DOI: 10.1049/el.2017.3244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified FRM‐based complex modulated filter bank structure with low complexity

Abstract: Software defined radios typically employ digital filter banks (FBs) for channelisation. Frequency response masking (FRM) approach is used to reduce the computational complexity of the complex modulated FB with narrow transition band. A unified FRM-based complex modulated FB structure is proposed to design sharp filters with arbitrary passband bandwidth. The proposed unified FRM-based complex modulated FB structure with low complexity is suitable for different even-stacked or odd-stacked, maximally decimated or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from Table 1 that the number of multipliers required by the method proposed in this paper is 96.75% lower than that of the basic low-pass structure, and 49.26% and 24.88% lower than that of the polyphase structure and [17], respectively. Although the proposed structure is 56.73% and 16.22% higher than the number of multipliers required by [24] and [31], respectively, we can see that in terms of group delay, this method is much less than [24] and [31], especially 93.38% less than [31]. Although it is more than based on polyphase structure, it is only a little more.…”
Section: B Complexity Analysis and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It can be seen from Table 1 that the number of multipliers required by the method proposed in this paper is 96.75% lower than that of the basic low-pass structure, and 49.26% and 24.88% lower than that of the polyphase structure and [17], respectively. Although the proposed structure is 56.73% and 16.22% higher than the number of multipliers required by [24] and [31], respectively, we can see that in terms of group delay, this method is much less than [24] and [31], especially 93.38% less than [31]. Although it is more than based on polyphase structure, it is only a little more.…”
Section: B Complexity Analysis and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…From (6), it can be deduced that for large values of L, higher-order sharp masking filters will be required due to the denser replicas in the even and odd BES-FB. To overcome this difficulty, the masking filters are implemented using a simpler variant of FRM, called interpolated FIR (IFIR) technique (18).…”
Section: Modified Frm Filter Bank Based On Alternate Masking Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per Equation (4), m is calculated as 3. The filter specifications for the masking filters are calculated using (6) and is given in Table IV. Subsequently, using Equations ( 8) to (11), the specifications of IFIR modal filter and the image-suppressor filter for the masking filters are determined for the optimum interpolation factor, L IF IR and are given in Table V and VI.…”
Section: Proposed Design Of Multiplier-less Modfrm-fbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the complexity can be reduced, no one has applied it to the polyphase inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) channelised structure. A unified FRM‐based complex‐modulated FB structure with low complexity was proposed in [15]. The proposed structure can reduce the implementation complexity and be applied to wideband systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%