2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2016.7487321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified bipedal gait for walking and running by dynamics-based virtual holonomic constraint in PDAC

Abstract: Conventional humanoids have achieved walking and running by independent controllers, even though a transition between these independent motions should be added to connect them while ensuring stability. In contrast, human selects walking/running at low/high speed in terms of energy efficiency, and transits between them naturally. This fact implies that human gait shares the inherent controller among walking and running despite their quite different appearances. Hence, we propose a "unified bipedal gait," which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite the importance of passive dynamics in bipedal locomotion control, it has not been sufficiently investigated in previous bipedal walking and running robots (Hodgins, 1991 ; Kwon and Park, 2003 ; Nagasaka et al, 2004 ; Tajima et al, 2009 ; Sreenath et al, 2013 ; Kobayashi et al, 2016 ; Siekmann et al, 2021 ). There are two possible reasons for this: (1) Robots with passive joints are more difficult to control than fully actuated robots because there is less scope for the control system to intervene in motion generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the importance of passive dynamics in bipedal locomotion control, it has not been sufficiently investigated in previous bipedal walking and running robots (Hodgins, 1991 ; Kwon and Park, 2003 ; Nagasaka et al, 2004 ; Tajima et al, 2009 ; Sreenath et al, 2013 ; Kobayashi et al, 2016 ; Siekmann et al, 2021 ). There are two possible reasons for this: (1) Robots with passive joints are more difficult to control than fully actuated robots because there is less scope for the control system to intervene in motion generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two approaches for biped modeling: distributed mass model and real parameter simplified model. The detail information form of dynamic parameters of the robot is discussed in [3]. The robot generates 3D walking motions ascertains dynamically by using linear constraints with approach efficient MPC, and successfully during walking on uneven terrains also walking on the ground [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%