2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified Approach toward Evaluating Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations near Slopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…e incorporation of rubber makes the interface between rubber and mortar form a transaction zone similar to that between aggregate and mortar. However, the strength of the R-M ITZ zone is lower than that of A-M ITZ and much lower than that of mortar [16,[23][24][25].…”
Section: Constitutive Behavior Of Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e incorporation of rubber makes the interface between rubber and mortar form a transaction zone similar to that between aggregate and mortar. However, the strength of the R-M ITZ zone is lower than that of A-M ITZ and much lower than that of mortar [16,[23][24][25].…”
Section: Constitutive Behavior Of Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Several mesoscale models, considering the mesostructure and the local failure mechanisms in concrete, have been proposed in the last few decades, aiming at a better understanding of structural on the longer-scale response of concrete [14][15][16]. Continuumbased finite element models are the main approaches employed in the literature [17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Constitutive Behavior Of Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above analysis, the purpose of this paper is to extend the UBLA method of slope stability with tension crack by Michalowski [5] and Utili and Abd [11] into slopes reinforced with prestressed anchor cables and seismic condition. A rotational failure mechanism (log-spiral surface) was considered to find the critical results [4,[31][32][33][34]. By comparison and analysis of existing slope examples, the correctness and feasibility of the proposed UBLA method have been verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bearing capacity and settlement are primary factors in the design of several types of geotechnical structures such as bridge foundations, building foundations close slopes, and roads in mountainous areas. Design of foundations adjacent to soil slopes depends significantly on a variety of factors such as foundation properties (shape, width, and depth), soil mechanical properties (friction angle, shear properties, and density), and distance of a foundation from the soil slope [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Since there are many situations where the bearing capacity of the footings adjacent to the sloping surfaces, are significantly reduced from that of footings located on horizontal ground, solutions such as improving the geometry of sloping surfaces, injections, or use of soil reinforcers are required to improve the bearing capacity of foundations under such conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%