1985
DOI: 10.1051/jphyslet:019850046010100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified approach to numerical transfer matrix methods for disordered systems : applications to mixed crystals and to elasticity percolation

Abstract: It is shown that the Negative Eigenvalue Theorem and transfer matrix methods may be considered within a unified framework and generalized to compute projected densities of states or, more generally, any linear combination of matrix elements of the inverse of large symmetric random matrices. As examples of applications, extensive simulations for one- and two-mode behaviour in the Raman spectrum of one-dimensional mixed crystals and a finite-size scaling analysis of critical exponents for the central force perco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
2
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
15
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we comment on the case X/p -1 already considered by other authors. We note that our result for the percolation threshold p Ce is in very good agreement with the most accurate estimate reported up to now, 8 The results for two additional values of X/p are also given in Table I. First, we note that p Ce increases with X/p.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…First, we comment on the case X/p -1 already considered by other authors. We note that our result for the percolation threshold p Ce is in very good agreement with the most accurate estimate reported up to now, 8 The results for two additional values of X/p are also given in Table I. First, we note that p Ce increases with X/p.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Nevertheless their numerically determined exponent ratio: T ce =t ce ¼ 3:0 AE 0:4, is still very close to that for bond-bending percolation. However, as noted by FENG (1985), two other estimates of T ce by FENG andSEN (1984) andLEMIEUX et al (1985) do not agree. Additionally CHAKRABATI and BENGUIGUI (1997) quote a value for T ce =t ce ¼ 1:12 AE 0:05 in two dimensions.…”
Section: Consistency With Previous Investigations Of Scaling Of Modulusmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…8,12 It has become clear that they have different critical elastic behavior but the full nature of this difference and its underlying causes have not yet been generally appreciated. In this Letter we address this issue: We present the first analysis of the geometry of the percolating rigid clusters for the two-dimensional central-force model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%