1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00874359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified approach to amplitude attenuation and coda excitation in the randomly inhomogeneous lithosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
2
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
29
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with Aki (1980) and Sato (1990) that postulated the existence of a lithospheric attenuation peak near 1 Hz. Table 2 lists the Lg Q frequency dependence functions obtained in different regions of the world.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…These results are in agreement with Aki (1980) and Sato (1990) that postulated the existence of a lithospheric attenuation peak near 1 Hz. Table 2 lists the Lg Q frequency dependence functions obtained in different regions of the world.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In the present analysis, we have found the following attenuation characteristics: the power of frequency dependence of Q s ' and Qp' is roughly the same in the high frequency range (>1 Hz); Qp'/QS' ratio is clearly larger than unity at frequencies higher than 1 Hz in contrast to the low frequency range (<1 Hz); Q'-' is smaller than Q-' for all frequency bands. These attentuation characteristics observed, as well as the existence of coda waves, are consistently explained by the single scattering model (Sato 1984(Sato , 1990). In Fig.…”
Section: Physical Mechanism Of Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…QC shows a strong dependence on frequency (Fig. 5) and lapse time Sato's (1984aSato's ( , 1990 model, this shows that the scale length of inhomogeneity is large in low frequency range. It seems natural that QC for low frequency range is responsible to longer wavelength fluctuation of random inhomogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%