Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0013067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unification in a combination of equational theories with shared constants and its application to primal algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (Domenjoud et al, 1994), we extend the result due to Nipkow (1991) about combination of matching algorithms in regular theories to the case where shared symbols satisfy an appropriate notion of constructors. By applying techniques introduced in (Ringeissen, 1992;Kirchner and Ringeissen, 1994), we are also able to combine non-disjoint partially linear theories provided that shared symbols are only constants like for instance in the union E 1 _ E 2 where…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (Domenjoud et al, 1994), we extend the result due to Nipkow (1991) about combination of matching algorithms in regular theories to the case where shared symbols satisfy an appropriate notion of constructors. By applying techniques introduced in (Ringeissen, 1992;Kirchner and Ringeissen, 1994), we are also able to combine non-disjoint partially linear theories provided that shared symbols are only constants like for instance in the union E 1 _ E 2 where…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is possible to decide if a given B-extended matching problem 1 is matching combinable. B-unification with constant restriction is unitary (Ringeissen, 1992) and it is sufficient to check, according to Lemma 2, that the most general unifier of 1! w.r.t.…”
Section: Matching Combinable Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper which extends Ringeissen (1992), Kirchner & Ringeissen (1992), we generalize the uni cation technique to constraint solvers on algebraic domains possibly sharing some constant symbols. We provide for such combination the construction of a combined constraint language and a standard interpretation in which solving a pure constraint is equivalent to solving it in one component of the combination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, previous work has focused on identifying specific conditions and methods in which the problem is decidable. We continue the investigation in this paper, building on previous combination results, [2,4,7] and [6]. We are able to develop a novel approach to the non-disjoint combination problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As a final remark, it is important to note that our algorithm C does not work in a symmetric way with respect to E 1 and E 2 , contrary to combination algorithms where we assume that any (Σ 1 ∩ Σ 2 )-equality is valid in E 1 if and only if it is valid in E 2 [2,4,7]. Indeed, the algorithm A 1 partially solves the problem modulo E 1 ∪ E 2 (and not only modulo E 1 ).…”
Section: Satisfying Restrictionmentioning
confidence: 99%