Abstract:Providing realistic sensory feedback for prosthetic devices strongly relies on an accurate modelling of machine-nerve interfaces. Models of these interfaces in the peripheral nervous system usually neglect the effects that ephaptic coupling can have on the selectivity of stimulating electrodes. In this contribution, we study the ephaptic stimulation between myelinated axons and show its relation with the separation between fibers and the conductivity of the medium that surrounds them.
“…It is not clear whether the observed change in CAP velocity agrees with modelling predictions in [24][25][26][27], that ephaptic interactions slow down the CAP, because the models did not consider external current. In the present study, it is conceivable that the partially excited membranes took less time to depolarize, which would produce the observed increase in CAP velocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…These interactions can improve synchrony of activity within populations of neural cells or triggering of neural activity in subthreshold cells, and may be induced either by naturally occurring physiological effects [17][18][19] or by artificially increasing excitability using chemicals [20,21] and subthreshold electrical current [18,22,23]. In myelinated nerve fibres, modelling studies predict ephaptic interactions alter the propagation velocities of action potentials in neighboring active fibres which improves synchrony [24][25][26][27], and an in vivo study on rat showed increased activity in response to an electrical stimulus when it was temporally coupled with a compound action potential (CAP) [28]. Increasing synchrony and localized triggering of new action potentials in peripheral nerves using a subthreshold current presents an exciting prospect because such a paradigm could improve the signal to noise ratio in peripheral nerve interfaces, aid physical rehabilitation after spinal cord injury and stroke, and provide insight into mechanisms of subthreshold current neuromodulation therapies.…”
The objective of this work was to determine whether application of subthreshold currents to the peripheral nerve increases the excitability of the underlying nerve fibres, and how this increased excitability would alter neural activity as it propagates through the subthreshold currents. Experiments were performed on two Romney crossbreed sheep in vivo, by applying subthreshold currents either at the stimulus site or between the stimulus and recording sites. Neural recordings were obtained from nerve cuff implanted on the peroneal or sciatic nerve branches, while stimulus was applied to either the peroneal nerve or pins placed through the lower hindshank.Results showed that subthreshold currents applied to the same site as stimulus increased excitation of underlying nerve fibres (p < 0.0001). With stimulus and subthreshold currents applied to different sites on the peroneal nerve, the primary CAP in the sciatic displayed a temporal shift of -2.5 to -3 µs which agreed with statistically significant changes in the CAP waveform (p<0.02). These findings contribute to the understanding of mechanisms in myelinated fibres of subthreshold current neuromodulation therapies.
“…It is not clear whether the observed change in CAP velocity agrees with modelling predictions in [24][25][26][27], that ephaptic interactions slow down the CAP, because the models did not consider external current. In the present study, it is conceivable that the partially excited membranes took less time to depolarize, which would produce the observed increase in CAP velocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…These interactions can improve synchrony of activity within populations of neural cells or triggering of neural activity in subthreshold cells, and may be induced either by naturally occurring physiological effects [17][18][19] or by artificially increasing excitability using chemicals [20,21] and subthreshold electrical current [18,22,23]. In myelinated nerve fibres, modelling studies predict ephaptic interactions alter the propagation velocities of action potentials in neighboring active fibres which improves synchrony [24][25][26][27], and an in vivo study on rat showed increased activity in response to an electrical stimulus when it was temporally coupled with a compound action potential (CAP) [28]. Increasing synchrony and localized triggering of new action potentials in peripheral nerves using a subthreshold current presents an exciting prospect because such a paradigm could improve the signal to noise ratio in peripheral nerve interfaces, aid physical rehabilitation after spinal cord injury and stroke, and provide insight into mechanisms of subthreshold current neuromodulation therapies.…”
The objective of this work was to determine whether application of subthreshold currents to the peripheral nerve increases the excitability of the underlying nerve fibres, and how this increased excitability would alter neural activity as it propagates through the subthreshold currents. Experiments were performed on two Romney crossbreed sheep in vivo, by applying subthreshold currents either at the stimulus site or between the stimulus and recording sites. Neural recordings were obtained from nerve cuff implanted on the peroneal or sciatic nerve branches, while stimulus was applied to either the peroneal nerve or pins placed through the lower hindshank.Results showed that subthreshold currents applied to the same site as stimulus increased excitation of underlying nerve fibres (p < 0.0001). With stimulus and subthreshold currents applied to different sites on the peroneal nerve, the primary CAP in the sciatic displayed a temporal shift of -2.5 to -3 µs which agreed with statistically significant changes in the CAP waveform (p<0.02). These findings contribute to the understanding of mechanisms in myelinated fibres of subthreshold current neuromodulation therapies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.