2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-29844-3_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unidirectional Cyclic Behavior of Old Masonry Walls in Romania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to define the material characteristics for all the numerical models used, specific information collected as a part of the seismic evaluation report was used. The material properties defined for existing masonry structures from Romania were previously tested as part of experimental campaigns (Lozinca et al, 2016), and further on, numerical models of masonry walls were calibrated based on them . Once capacity curves were obtained for each model, level II methodology from the RISK-UE project (Milutinovic and Trendafiloski, 2003) was used to establish thresholds for each damage level (minor, moderate, extensive, and complete) and then obtain fragility curves expressed function of median values of spectral displacements and standard deviations.…”
Section: Structural Fragilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to define the material characteristics for all the numerical models used, specific information collected as a part of the seismic evaluation report was used. The material properties defined for existing masonry structures from Romania were previously tested as part of experimental campaigns (Lozinca et al, 2016), and further on, numerical models of masonry walls were calibrated based on them . Once capacity curves were obtained for each model, level II methodology from the RISK-UE project (Milutinovic and Trendafiloski, 2003) was used to establish thresholds for each damage level (minor, moderate, extensive, and complete) and then obtain fragility curves expressed function of median values of spectral displacements and standard deviations.…”
Section: Structural Fragilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these invasive traditional methods are strongly debated (Campos Pomba, 2007) since they might produce important variations in the global behavior of the structure in terms of stiffness and load-bearing capacity, potentially leading to inappropriate force distributions (Monteiro and Bento, 2012). Alternative retrofitting methods were also studied for the existing residential building stock from Romania, both in experimental campaigns (Lozinca et al, 2016) and through numerical models, in particular for a typical project of mediumrise apartment buildings retrofitted by means of fiber carbon sheets applied as an alternative to RC jacketing (Scupin et al, 2020). In literature, large-scale seismic risk assessments were performed by various methods, and the outcomes are presented in various ways, through risk maps or risk indicators such as the annual average loss ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, previous studies have shown that the geometry, coupling level, and material properties, influence not only the strength but also the deformation capacity and cyclic degradation of masonry (Vasconcelos and Lourenço 2009;Asteris et al 2014). For example, cyclic tests on ambient-dry unreinforced clay-brick/lime-mortar masonry squat walls with a heightto-depth ratio of 0.7 have indicated an essentially elastic response up to a lateral drift of about 0.05%, limited deterioration up to 0.1%, and an ultimate drift of around 0.6% (Lozincă et al 2016). Comparative cyclic tests on dry low-strength mortar masonry also indicated a modification in failure mode from combined rocking-shear to rocking when the height-to-depth aspect ratio increased from 0.7 to 1.4, representative of squat and slender elements, respectively (ElGawady et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although experimental assessments on ambient-dry masonry walls representative of heritage structures have been carried out (Calvi et al 1996;Tomaževič et al 1996;Lozincă et al 2016;ElGawady et al 2005;Capozucca 2011;Kržan et al 2015a;Magenes et al 2010;Ismail and Ingham 2012), previous studies to investigate the lateral cyclic performance of wet large-scale masonry are limited. The compressive and tensile mechanical properties of wet brick lime mortar masonry subjected to in-situ push-only cyclic loading were reported to be 30% and 36% lower, respectively, than those of corresponding members in dry conditions (Kržan et al 2015b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%