Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3284869.3284900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UniBS4All

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve the issues Fig. 3 Distribution of the analyzed papers according to the type of application/device about architecture compatibility, a few studies illustrate applications for both the operating systems, exploiting also hybrid solutions (e.g., [12,44,100]).…”
Section: Mobile Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To solve the issues Fig. 3 Distribution of the analyzed papers according to the type of application/device about architecture compatibility, a few studies illustrate applications for both the operating systems, exploiting also hybrid solutions (e.g., [12,44,100]).…”
Section: Mobile Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papers that adopt a UD approach propose applications that could be used by any kind of user, regardless of her/his disability or temporary impairment condition, through a proper setting of user profile in the application. UniBS4All [12,59] pursues this goal for outdoor wayfinding and navigation, by providing route generation for private cars and public transportation, beyond accessible pedestrian paths; users that do not declare any type of disability can use the application as well, finding the same features of well-known commercial map navigators. A similar approach is adopted in [10], where the goal is making a university campus accessible to all students and visitors.…”
Section: All Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second group of empirical studies focuses on user perspectives and pays particular attention to criteria such as user satisfaction and the usefulness of route planning tools. For instance, Arenghi et al [13] carried out a usability experiment involving two versions of a mobile application for accessible wayfinding and navigation in an urban university campus. Among their identified design issues was the ability for users with physical disabilities to indicate the presence of barriers.…”
Section: Empirical Studies Of Route Planners For Use By Pedestriansmentioning
confidence: 99%