Recently reported quasiparticle interference imaging in underdoped Ca(Fe1−xCox)2As2 shows pronounced C2 asymmetry that is interpreted as an indication of an electronic nematic phase with a unidirectional electron band, dispersive predominantly along the b-axis of this orthorhombic material. On the other hand, even more recent transport measurements on untwinned samples show near isotropy of the resistivity in the ab plane, with slightly larger conductivity along a (and not b). We show that in fact both sets of data are consistent with the calculated ab initio Fermi surfaces, which has a decisevly broken C4, and yet similar Fermi velocity in both directions. This reconciles completely the apparent contradiction between the conclusions of the STM and the transport experiments.PACS numbers: 74.20. Pq,74.25.Jb,74.70.Xa The Fe-based superconductors present a new paradigm for high-T C superconductivity as here Cooper-pairs appear to emerge upon chemical doping from a metallic ground state as opposed from a Mott insulator as found in the celebrated High-T C cuprates 3 . Despite this difference of parent ground state of the Fe-and Cu-based superconductors, similarities lie in that in both cases superconductivity emerges after the suppression of static ordered magnetism 4 . Although band theory has correctly predicted the unusual antiferromagnetic (AFM) order in the parent compounds of the Fe-based superconductors, it consistently overestimates the tendency to magnetism and underestimates the electronic mass, so there is no doubt that electronic interactions can not be ignored in quantitative descriptions, and that they play a different role compared to cuprates. The exact role of correlations, especially once the parent phase of the Fesuperconductors is doped, has been the focus of much debate and controversy.An almost universal feature of the Fe-superconductors is that in the parent phases, there is a tetragonal to orthorhombic structural phase transition that is closely associated with the onset of antiferromagnetic order 5 . Upon chemical doping x, the onset of the structural and magnetic transitions (T S and T N respectively) decrease with x and superconductivity emerges. The physical nature of the cross over from antiferromagnetic order to superconductivity varies between specific materials. In some cases both T S and T N coincide while in others T S is a few degrees higher than T N 5 . Band structure calculations have suggested that the AFM ordering is accompanied by a strong restructuring of the Fermi surface, with the Fermi surface area being reduced by roughly an order of magnitude. This has been confirmed by optical and Hall measurements that register a drastic reduction of the carrier concentration in the AFM state 6 . The calculated AFM Fermi surface consists of several small pockets, which are arranged in the Brillouin zone in a way that strongly breaks the tetragonal symmetry, but each of them is rather isotropic 2 . This led to a prediction of small transport anisotropy. An alternative point of view, th...