2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniaxial and biaxial ratcheting behavior of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FCG rate under circular and square nonproportional loading paths with 90° phase difference is between that of uniaxial and proportional loading paths. The FCG rate under square path is slightly higher than that under circular path, and it is consistent with the research of biaxial ratcheting behavior of UHMWPE by Gao et al ()) and the in‐plane biaxial cyclic mechanical behavior of proton exchange membrane by Lin et al (). From the loading path diagrams (Figure a–c), it can be found that the circular path is completely covered by the square path, so the difference of FCG rates under square and circular paths can also be explained from the perspective of energy consumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FCG rate under circular and square nonproportional loading paths with 90° phase difference is between that of uniaxial and proportional loading paths. The FCG rate under square path is slightly higher than that under circular path, and it is consistent with the research of biaxial ratcheting behavior of UHMWPE by Gao et al ()) and the in‐plane biaxial cyclic mechanical behavior of proton exchange membrane by Lin et al (). From the loading path diagrams (Figure a–c), it can be found that the circular path is completely covered by the square path, so the difference of FCG rates under square and circular paths can also be explained from the perspective of energy consumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, it is worth noting that current studies on the FCG behavior of UHMWPE and its modified materials were mostly carried out under uniaxial loading, while the FCG under biaxial loading has been rarely reported. UHMWPE artificial joint component is always subjected to complex loadings such as tension, compression, bending, and shear stress during its service (Gao, Wang, Li, Gao, & Zhang, ). The materials may have some microdefects in the process of machining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halama et al 18 investigated the effects of average stress and stress amplitude on the steady‐state ratcheting effect of ST52 steel material and proposed a new cyclic shaping model, which can accurately describe its ratcheting behavior and cyclic hardening behavior under proportional and nonproportional loading. Gao et al 19 studied the uniaxial and biaxial ratcheting behavior of ultra‐high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMW‐PE) and found that uniaxial loading paths produced the largest ratcheting strains and ratcheting strain and its rate were minimized by proportional loading path. Chen and Chen 20 and Khutia et al 21 carried out experimental study for 304 stainless steel under in‐plane biaxial cyclic loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, additional design procedures have to be employed to guarantee the resistance to creep [12] and ratcheting [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research studies are available on the ratcheting behavior of bulk UHMWPE under uniaxial [13,[17][18][19] or biaxial [14,[20][21][22] loading, considering also the effect of additives [23,24] in particular for biomechanical applications, but to the authors' knowledge, there are no studies in the scientific literature on the ratcheting behavior of UHMWPE fibers, yarns, or strips.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%