2018
DOI: 10.1080/16184742.2018.1517272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unfolding the Twitter scene of the 2017 UEFA Champions League Final: social media networks and power dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
2
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
43
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the digital media ecosystem, social networks have acquired great social relevance [ 11 ], joining traditional socializing agents (family, school, peer groups and communication media) in information processes and identity construction [ 12 , 13 ]. Twitter has become one of the most used social networks as a news media by stakeholders [ 14 , 15 ] as well as by journalists [ 16 , 17 ], and of course by its users [ 18 ], being employed by very diverse audiences to get information on news events [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the digital media ecosystem, social networks have acquired great social relevance [ 11 ], joining traditional socializing agents (family, school, peer groups and communication media) in information processes and identity construction [ 12 , 13 ]. Twitter has become one of the most used social networks as a news media by stakeholders [ 14 , 15 ] as well as by journalists [ 16 , 17 ], and of course by its users [ 18 ], being employed by very diverse audiences to get information on news events [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the literature on digital tools and digitalization has focused on professional sports clubs and analysed the implementation and application of digital technologies in high performance sport. Hence, the use of digital technologies for opening up new target groups and marketing opportunities has been examined in some detail, including sports fans use of mobile apps and online platforms (Kang, 2015 ; McGillivray and McLaughlin, 2019 ; Qian et al, 2019 ), elite athletes use of social media platforms (Geurin-Eagleman and Burch, 2015 ; Chawansky, 2016 ), resistance to digitalization in elite sport (Trabal, 2008 ; Tjønndal, 2020 ), social media activities and corporate communication (Waters et al, 2010 ; Yan et al, 2018 ) as part of sports clubs' branding strategies (Watkins and Lewis, 2014 ; Bertschy et al, 2019 ), and online educational and administrative resources for sports organizations (Sellitto et al, 2016 ; Strachan et al, 2016 ). A notable exception to the literature on technology and digitalization in professional sports is Ehnold et al, 2020 study of voluntary sports clubs and their use of digital tools.…”
Section: Analytical Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means the level of interest accrued by different accounts is uneven by nature. It therefore brings back the essential phenomenon that gatekeeping theory emphasizes—there is imbalance of power in terms of what kind of information is selected and what level of influence it can have on the public (Yan, Watanabe, Shapiro, Naraine, & Hull, 2018). In specific examinations, scholars pointed out that digital gatekeeping practices were complex processes where individual agency interacted with networks and algorithms in producing outcome (Thorson & Wells, 2015; Vos & Heinderyckx, 2015).…”
Section: Gatekeeping and Communication In Sportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results delineated both centralized and decentralized patterns of gatekeeping in discussions on political candidates and events. In the context of sport, Yan et al (2018) disclosed how gatekeeping was performed through networked communications where elite sport organizations and enterprises had more advantages in setting agendas and accruing attention during sport events.…”
Section: Gatekeeping and Communication In Sportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation