2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unfolding of population structure in Baltic sheep breeds using microsatellite analysis

Abstract: Studies of domestic animals are performed on breeds, but a breed does not necessarily equate to a genetically defined population. The division of sheep from three native and four modern Baltic sheep breeds was studied using 21 microsatellite loci and applying a Bayesian clustering method. A traditional breed-wise approach was compared to that relying on the pattern of molecular diversity. In this study, a breed was found to be inconsistent with a distinct genetic population for three reasons: (i) a lack of dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
44
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(30 reference statements)
5
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results of F-statistics [28], 11% of the total genetic variation in the Serbian Tsigai sheep can be explained by type differences. This significant differentiation exceeds that detected among six Spanish sheep breeds (6%, eight markers in common with our study) [2], among seven Baltic breeds (8.8%, 21 common markers) [24] and even that presented for 57 European and Middle Eastern sheep breeds (approximately on average 6%, eight common markers) [15]. Moreover, the Bayesian assignment of animals to the source populations supported the clear-cut differentiation between the two Tsigai types (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…According to the results of F-statistics [28], 11% of the total genetic variation in the Serbian Tsigai sheep can be explained by type differences. This significant differentiation exceeds that detected among six Spanish sheep breeds (6%, eight markers in common with our study) [2], among seven Baltic breeds (8.8%, 21 common markers) [24] and even that presented for 57 European and Middle Eastern sheep breeds (approximately on average 6%, eight common markers) [15]. Moreover, the Bayesian assignment of animals to the source populations supported the clear-cut differentiation between the two Tsigai types (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The difference of results regarding the distinctiveness between populations sampled in Bosnia and Herzegovina and in Croatia could be a result of systematic recording and selection programme implemented by the Croatian Agriculture Agency during several decades, complemented with clear geographical boundaries between the populations/breeds in Croatia. As reported for Baltic sheep (Tapio et al, 2005), four populations, sampled as traditional breeds in Bosnia and Herzegovina, do not equate to genetically distinct populations. According to the structure analysis and the N m and F st estimates reported here, the largest influence on other Bosnian populations comes from VLA, with status and distribution similar to DAL in Croatia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…From these considerations and given the importance of the local genetic resources, it is easily understandable the considerable interest given nowadays to genetic diversity studies in domestic animals in general and, recently, in small ruminants (Baumung et al, 2004). Genetic diversity studies in domestic animals aim at evaluating genetic variation within and across breeds, since the breed is the management unit for which factors such as inbreeding are controlled (Tapio et al, 2005). However, the definition of a breed, as applied by FAO, frequently does not reflect the underlying genetic population structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%