1987
DOI: 10.1016/0020-711x(87)90184-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unfolding of iron and copper complexes of human lactoferrin and transferrin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because only one highly cooperative transition was observed for the SUPREX curves obtained for apotransferrin (Figure A−C). This is consistent with the results of earlier studies in which one cooperative unfolding transition was observed for apotransferrin in a conventional GdmCl denaturation experiment. , The relatively large m -values determined for the fragments in our SUPREX-protease digestion experiments on apotransferrin are also consistent with the increased cooperativity that would be expected if the two lobes of apotransferrin simultaneously unfolded in the GdmCl-induced equilibrium unfolding reaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is because only one highly cooperative transition was observed for the SUPREX curves obtained for apotransferrin (Figure A−C). This is consistent with the results of earlier studies in which one cooperative unfolding transition was observed for apotransferrin in a conventional GdmCl denaturation experiment. , The relatively large m -values determined for the fragments in our SUPREX-protease digestion experiments on apotransferrin are also consistent with the increased cooperativity that would be expected if the two lobes of apotransferrin simultaneously unfolded in the GdmCl-induced equilibrium unfolding reaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With the apotransferrin, the thermodynamic equilibrium is reached very rapidly, whereas with hololactoferrin the ®nal equilibrated state is attained a few thousand seconds later after iron loss (Figure 1). This implies, as already reported, that the iron load protects the transferrin from denaturation (Harrington et al, 1987;Harrington, 1992). Indeed, hololactoferrin keeps its iron-binding capacities even after mild tryptic digestion (Legrand et al, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This re¯ects a common change in conformation, which may be a partial unfolding of lactoferrin. Folding and unfolding of transferrins are not well known and, to our knowledge, the kinetics of unfolding of these proteins have not been investigated (Morgan & Peters, 1985;Harrington et al, 1987;Harrington, 1992;Lodish & Kong, 1991;Kilar & Hjerten, 1993;Ou et al, 1993;Wada et al, 1997). This change in conformation affects both apo-and holotransferrin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iron-binding capacity of lactoferrin is dependent on the presence of (small amounts) of (bi)carbonate. The binding site appears to be optimized for the binding of ferric iron and (bi)carbonate with respect to size, charge and stereochemistry, as evidenced from a number of structural studies with different anions and cations, or using mutant recombinant lactoferrins (Harrington et al 1987;Baker et al 1994;Brodie et al 1994;Faber et al 1997). Oxalate can replace (bi)carbonate with regard to iron binding, but citrate can not.…”
Section: Iron Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%