Unfair Competition by Monopolistic Corporations

Wyman, Bruce

doi:10.1177/000271621204200108

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Unfair Competition Obstructs Potential Competition1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1964

1997

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They reasoned like Bruce Wyman of Harvard Law School that fair competition would always be possible if unfair competition were forbidden. 37 Other writers, however, stressed the need for measures going beyond a ban on unfair competition. Laughlin considered the abolition of tariffs on trust-made goods "the one powerful means" to secure effective competition.…”

Section: Unfair Competition Obstructs Potential Competitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Potential Competition and the American Antitrust Legislation of 1914

Klebaner

1964

Bus. Hist. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Unfair Competition Obstructs Potential Competitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Potential Competition and the American Antitrust Legislation of 1914

Klebaner

1964

Bus. Hist. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Political Economy of American Populism from Jackson to the New Deal

Goebel

1997

Stud. Am. Pol. Dev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the past few decades, historians engaged in the study of American Populism have advanced a number of conflicting interpretations of the last great protest movement of the nineteenth century. Among the most influential representations of Populism have been the following: Populists as reactionary and vaguely anti-Semitic predecessors of American fascism, as agrarian romantics nostalgically clinging to the Jeffersonian ideal of the independent yeoman, as modern reformers embracing an American version of social democracy, as agrarian republicans aiming to build a cooperative commonwealth on the basis of mutuality, and as true radicals offering the final challenge to the rise of corporate capitalism in America. Although no final agreement on the true nature of Populism has been achieved, despite the impressive scholarly output that has made the study of Populism into a minor cottage industry among historians, there has been a powerful trend toward a renewed appreciation of the radical character of Populist protest. In challenging the dominance of the two major parties and in advocating a comprehensive program of economic and social reform, American Populists are widely regarded as reflecting a ground swell of opposition to corporate America. With the demise of Populism after the disastrous election of 1896, the hopes for building a radically different America faded.

show abstract

Unfair Competition by Monopolistic Corporations

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Potential Competition and the American Antitrust Legislation of 1914

Potential Competition and the American Antitrust Legislation of 1914

The Political Economy of American Populism from Jackson to the New Deal

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About