Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3313831.3376227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unfabricate: Designing Smart Textiles for Disassembly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recycling of conductive yarns, fabrics or fibres is not mentioned. Only Reuse of yarns is offered by Wu and Devendorf (2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The recycling of conductive yarns, fabrics or fibres is not mentioned. Only Reuse of yarns is offered by Wu and Devendorf (2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most cited paper is from McCann et al (2005), which is also the oldest paper published. Least cited papers are from Wu and Devendorf (2020) and Goncu-Berk (2019) which are the most recent studies. Köhler, who frequently is the most represented and cited in the results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While we cannot precisely anticipate the impact of widespread adoption of personal fabrication, we can explore potential futures through diegetic and physical prototypes as an attempt to resolve the Collingridge Dilemma we face [20]. Designing fabrication techniques to incorporate disassembly as demonstrated by Wu and Devendorf [91] is one way to positively address artifact ephemerality while still embracing iterations and prototypes. Similarly, Song and Paulos embrace the act of "unmaking", focusing on processes starting from a seemingly ideal, finished artifact instead of initiating from (raw) material [75].…”
Section: Positive Embedding Of Ephemeralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our current stance on sustainability and the way it is considered for novel systems for personal fabrication is unfit for a future of widespread, ubiquitous personal fabrication: it is often deferred to recycling processes, material science or not considered at all, as novel systems aim to create lasting artifacts. We argue that systems that embed sustainable material use in their interactions themselves (e.g., Unfabricate [91]) are indispensable for further research in personal fabrication, if the path of ever simpler and faster personal fabrication is to be followed. In particular, as the associated processes (e.g., design/modeling, fabrication) become easier, faster, and more effortless.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%