2017
DOI: 10.1111/abac.12102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unexpected Inflation, Capital Structure, and Real Risk‐adjusted Firm Performance

Abstract: Managers can improve real risk-adjusted firm performance by matching nominal assets with nominal liabilities, thereby reducing the sensitivity of real risk-adjusted returns to unexpected inflation. The net asset value of US equity real estate investment trusts (REITs) serves as a good proxy for nominal assets and, accordingly, we use a sample of US REITs to test our hypothesis. We find that for the firms in our sample: (i) their real risk-adjusted performance, and (ii) their inflation-hedging qualities are inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with results concerning the role of macroeconomic conditions and national institutions on cash holdings management (Demir and Ersan (2017); Orlova and Sun (2018)), capital structure decisions (Korajczyk and Levy (2003); Cook and Tang (2010); Gungoraydinoglu andÖztekin (2011);Öztekin and Flannery (2012); Belkhir et al (2016); Alcock and Steiner (2017); Botta and Colombo (2017);Ç olak et al (2018)), the cost of issuing equity (Guyot et al (2014); Botta (2019b)), and the cost of borrowing new funds (Krivogorsky et al (2018)).…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These findings are consistent with results concerning the role of macroeconomic conditions and national institutions on cash holdings management (Demir and Ersan (2017); Orlova and Sun (2018)), capital structure decisions (Korajczyk and Levy (2003); Cook and Tang (2010); Gungoraydinoglu andÖztekin (2011);Öztekin and Flannery (2012); Belkhir et al (2016); Alcock and Steiner (2017); Botta and Colombo (2017);Ç olak et al (2018)), the cost of issuing equity (Guyot et al (2014); Botta (2019b)), and the cost of borrowing new funds (Krivogorsky et al (2018)).…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…While our findings align with Lassala et al. (2017) ; Alcock and Steiner (2017) , they are inconsistent with Baciu and Petre (2018) . The coefficient of EXI is significantly negative, which aligns with the agency theory and Hossain (2020) .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“… Risk: Standard deviation of EBIT is used as a proxy of risk (Scott, 1981). In this regard, managers are able to improve real risk-adjusted corporate performance via matching nominal assets with nominal liabilities, hence reducing the sensitivity of a real risk (Alcock & Steiner, 2017).…”
Section: -Other Variables (Control)mentioning
confidence: 99%