1963
DOI: 10.1038/197716a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unequal Weighting in Numerical Taxonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where w k = weights for the kth character and |.....| is the absolute value operator. The weights for this city-block metric were defined as 1 q where q = 1 or the number of sub-character states scored underneath that character (if it had any)-following the philosophy of Proctor and Kendrick (1963) without the additional plus 1. These weighted 'band pass…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where w k = weights for the kth character and |.....| is the absolute value operator. The weights for this city-block metric were defined as 1 q where q = 1 or the number of sub-character states scored underneath that character (if it had any)-following the philosophy of Proctor and Kendrick (1963) without the additional plus 1. These weighted 'band pass…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibly we need not be too concerned about this since experience has shown that even considerable weighting of characters does not affect the computation of similarity coefficients unduly, i.e., the similarity matrices are quite robust. For this reason weighting of characters as proposed by Proctor and Kendrick (1963) may not really be necessary.…”
Section: Objections To the Use Of Phenetic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, in a recent stimulating review Johnson (1968) has drawn attention to a weighting paradox discussed in an unjustly-neglected paper by Kendrick (1965), and arising from earlier taxonometric studies by the same author (Proctor and Kendrick 1963;Kendrick and Proctor 1964); this concerns the not uncommon case of serially dependent attributes. A simple example would be: fruit a drupe, capsule or berry;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%