1974
DOI: 10.1016/0008-8749(74)90029-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unequal expression of allelic allotypic specificities in circulating immunoglobulins, experimentally-elicited antibodies, and receptor-carrying cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also suggest that the quantitative imbalances in allotype expression by mature B cells and plasma cells in heterozygotes (Chou et al 1974) may be due to immunoregulatory mechanisms rather than preferential gene activation.…”
Section: In Vivo Effects Of Anti-allotype Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Our results also suggest that the quantitative imbalances in allotype expression by mature B cells and plasma cells in heterozygotes (Chou et al 1974) may be due to immunoregulatory mechanisms rather than preferential gene activation.…”
Section: In Vivo Effects Of Anti-allotype Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The number of lymphocytes stimulated to transform is also deereased in suppressed rabbits (Sell 1968b, Marcuson & Roitt 1969, Harrison et al 1974. 5) There is a pecking order of allotypie expression (b4 > b6 > b5 > b9) in the serum immunoglobulin concentrations (Rieder & Oudin 1963, Lark et al 1965, Catty et al 1969, Dubiski et al 1970 and tissue plasma cells (Chou 1972(Chou , 1974 of heterozygous rabbits. In general, this same peck-STEWART SELL ing order exists for the magnitude of the blast transformation response , Sell 1968a.…”
Section: Similarities Of Allotype Suppression and Allotype Transformamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following "pecking order" is observed: b4 > bS > b6 > b9 with a b4/b9 allelic ratio of 80:20 (3)(4)(5)(6). These alleles are characterized by a high level of divergence at the protein level (ranging from 22 to 33% of divergence).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%